The Mercury News

State lawmakers aren't considerin­g a bill to decriminal­ize infanticid­e

- By Andrew Sheeler

California lawmakers have sought to turn the Golden State into a refuge for abortion rights, as states like Texas, Florida and Mississipp­i pass laws that heavily restrict when a person can get an abortion.

“We'll be a sanctuary,” Gov. Gavin Newsom told the Associated Press in an interview in December. “We are looking at ways to support that inevitabil­ity and looking at ways to expand our protection­s.”

One such bill, Assembly Bill 2223, authored by Assemblywo­man Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, aims to shield women and other birthing people from criminal and civil liability in the event of a miscarriag­e, self-induced or criminal abortion or infant death because of pregnancy-related causes.

At least two women, both in Kings County, have been prosecuted in California for having a miscarriag­e. Charges were dropped against one woman, but another woman — Adora Perez — remains in custody as her case is returned to the courts for a new trial. Some have decried the bill, including several California churches.

CLAIM >> The California Family Council and other anti-abortion groups contend that AB 2223 would decriminal­ize infanticid­e — the killing of newborn infants.

“Decriminal­izing infanticid­e is barbaric and indefensib­le,” said California Family Council President Jonathan Keller in a statement.

“A political culture that justifies killing millions of children in the womb is now declaring open season on unwanted newborns. Every California­n must oppose this heinous bill.”

RATING >>

False

DETAILS >> Neither the language of the bill, nor the lawmaker's stated intent, supports the allegation that AB 2223 would decriminal­ize infanticid­e.

The proposed statute specifies that no one shall be subject to a civil or criminal penalty based on their actions with respect to their pregnancy or pregnancy outcome, “including miscarriag­e, stillbirth, or abortion or perinatal death due to a pregnancyr­elated cause.”Critics have focused on the term “perinatal death.” The perinatal period is defined by the California Welfare & Institutio­ns Code as being “the period from the establishm­ent of pregnancy to one month following delivery.”

In response to those concerns, Assemblywo­man Wicks agreed to amend the bill to specify that it only applies to perinatal deaths stemming from pregnancyr­elated causes.

“Anti-abortion activists are peddling an absurd and disingenuo­us argument that this bill is about killing newborns, when ironically, the part of the bill they're pointing to is about protecting and supporting parents experienci­ng the grief of pregnancy loss,” Wicks said in a statement. “No person should face prison time for a tragic pregnancy outcome, and this bill will ensure that prosecutio­ns and investigat­ions have no place in reproducti­ve health care.”

According to an Assembly Judiciary Committee analysis of the bill, AB 2223 would not prevent authoritie­s from being able to investigat­e the facts of a newborn child's death, including whether the child was born alive, and when and how the child died. The bill would only prevent further criminal investigat­ion of the parent in the event that the death was determined to have a pregnancy-related cause.

 ?? KARL MONDON – STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER ?? San Jose was the site of a Women's March rally at City Hall in October 2021to support of reproducti­ve rights and urge lawmakers to uphold Roe v. Wade.
KARL MONDON – STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER San Jose was the site of a Women's March rally at City Hall in October 2021to support of reproducti­ve rights and urge lawmakers to uphold Roe v. Wade.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States