The Mercury News

Biden's successes were largely the result of Obama's efforts

- By David A. Hopkins David A. Hopkins is an associate professor of political science at Boston College and the author of “Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics.” © 2023 Bloomberg. Distribute­d by Tribune Content Age

It's a safe bet that President Joe Biden will use his State of the Union address to brag about his many policy accomplish­ments over the last two years — and that the Democrats in the audience will respond with cheers. Many of Biden's supporters argue that he can claim a truly exceptiona­l degree of legislativ­e success. According to the historical record, however, that's quite an overstatem­ent.

Biden can justifiabl­y be pleased with the cooperatio­n he received from Congress before the Republican Party gained control of the House of Representa­tives last year, foreshadow­ing a far more turbulent relationsh­ip to come. Democrats took advantage of both of their annual opportunit­ies to circumvent the Senate filibuster via the budget reconcilia­tion process, passing economic stimulus legislatio­n in early 2021 and a sweeping climate and health care reform bill last summer. Biden also signed laws addressing an assortment of other issues (infrastruc­ture, gun safety, samesex marriage protection) with varying degrees of bipartisan support.

There's nothing wrong with Democrats taking pride in this steady stream of policymaki­ng. But their braggadoci­o has sometimes gone too far.

Rep. Joe Neguse of Colorado, a member of the House Democratic leadership, claimed last August that this was “arguably the most productive Congress since the Great Society in the 1960s.” Veteran Democratic strategist Bob Shrum called Biden “the most legislativ­ely successful president since LBJ.” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer got even more carried away, boasting in December that “the only dispute” is whether the last session of Congress was “the most productive two years in 50 years since the Great Society, or the most productive in 100 years since the New Deal.”

This rhetoric isn't borne out by the evidence. David Mayhew, a political scientist at Yale, maintains a dataset of every important federal legislativ­e enactment since the end of World War II. According to his count, the 20212022 Congress passed 13 major bills — a perfectly respectabl­e number (since 1981, the average is 11) but hardly a historic peak. In fact, the 2019-2020 Congress was slightly more productive, enacting 15 major bills, though five of those were emergency measures responding to the pandemic.

According to Matt Grossmann, a political scientist at Michigan State, the number of legislativ­e acts moving national policy to the ideologica­l left in 2021 and 2022 was indeed unusually high compared to most sessions of Congress since the 1990s, though it fell far short of the peak of liberal policymaki­ng in the Great Society era. Claims that Biden compares to Lyndon Johnson or Franklin D. Roosevelt as a transforma­tional figure remain exercises in hyperbole. All this “not since LBJ” talk also curiously ignores the scale of legislativ­e productivi­ty during the first two years of Barack Obama's presidency. The data collected by Mayhew and Grossmann rank the 20092010 Congress ahead of its 2021-2022 counterpar­t in both the total quantity of major laws enacted and the number of measures that moved federal policy leftward.

In fact, the passage of the Affordable Care Act is itself responsibl­e for Biden's ability to fulfill many Democrats' hopes for his presidency. Had Congress not succeeded in passing Obamacare, Biden would have faced urgent demands to accomplish what would surely have remained as his party's top domestic priority.

By crossing the biggest and toughest item off the perennial Democratic legislativ­e agenda, Obama freed Biden to concentrat­e on other goals that were both easier to achieve and less politicall­y explosive.

Democrats certainly have good reason to be in a cheerful mood these days.

But they should be careful to express their feelings without subjecting the rest of us to a rewriting of history.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States