The Mercury News

Value stocks? Growth stocks? Classifica­tions turn topsy-turvy

- By Jeff Sommer

It is impossible even to talk about the long bull market that ended in January 2022 without saying high-growth tech stocks propelled the market higher.

Companies including Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia and Tesla dominated the headlines for years. Tech stocks and growth stocks were virtually synonymous.

But not anymore. The new growth stocks, in the estimation of S&P Dow Jones Indices, an influentia­l market analysis firm, now include fossil fuel energy companies.

The world has changed radically in the past year or two, and traditiona­l categories, such as growth and value, are topsy-turvy.

S&P Dow Jones Indices handles the plumbing behind the two most famous U.S. stock market indexes — the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average — and many other important world market benchmarks.

In an annual review of the S&P 500 index, it has found that the seemingly immutable connection­s between tech and growth, and between energy and value, in the stock market have weakened, if not snapped entirely.

The findings

Investors have often viewed growth and value stocks as two essential categories. Basically, growth stocks promise a lot in the future but deliver less right now. Value stocks, on the other hand, aren't usually trendy. They are priced well below what their advocates consider to be their real worth.

But which stocks belong in each category? The answer seemed obvious, until the stock market collapsed in 2022. The prices of tech companies were shriveling, and they pulled the entire market down.

Now, using strictly mathematic­al measures, S&P Dow Jones Indices has found that Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft are no longer “pure growth” stocks. They have been replaced in the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index by an unlikely group: fossil fuel companies such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron.

These conclusion­s are a startling sign of how much the world and its financial markets have been battered in the last year or two.

Until the S&P Indices findings, for example, Exxon and Chevron had been almost universall­y classified as value stocks. In the thinking that prevailed a couple of years ago, an urgent need to address global warming impaired the long-term viability of fossil fuel companies. Even among investors who favored their shares, these firms were presumed to be a good value precisely because they were so unfashiona­ble. Last year, at least, those assumption­s about growth and value stocks were overturned, along with many other presumptio­ns about the world.

The world changed

Russia's yearlong war in Ukraine set off a series of unanticipa­ted shocks that elevated world oil and gas prices. Energy prices have come down a bit but still remain high.

Publicly traded energy companies had outsize gains in sales, profits and stock prices. Exxon and Chevron have both reported record profits for last year. The S&P 500 dropped more than 18% in 2022, but energy was the only sector to rise, with an eye-popping total return of almost 67%, including dividends. The sector's sales, price and earnings momentum transforme­d its biggest components into growth stocks, at least in the backward-looking lens used by S&P 500 Indices.

At the same time, the eight big tech companies stumbled, for idiosyncra­tic reasons, as well as systemic ones. Tesla, for example, faces serious competitio­n in the market for electric vehicles, even as the Twitter escapades of its proprietor, Elon Musk, may be turning off some would-be car buyers. Meta reported a continuing decline in sales and earnings Wednesday, though its stock soared on plans for further share buybacks, amid a broad stock market rally fueled by hopes that the Federal Reserve's interest rate increases were abating. Still, the scale of its unprofitab­le investment­s in virtual reality have worried many investors. Netflix, which once said it competed only with sleep for the attention of its subscriber­s, now jousts with a horde of streaming companies.

But, in broad terms, two real-world factors are responsibl­e for their reclassifi­cation this year. First, while the initial, lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic generally increased tech firms' sales and profits in 2020 and 2021, it set them up for a sharp decline in their growth rates in 2022 as the economy recovered.

Second, soaring inflation and rising interest rates — the Fed raised short-term rates again Feb. 1 — hurt the tech companies, too. Why? Basically because tech companies that entice investors with the mere promise of future sales and profits are worth less when the costs of waiting for those promises rise.

In short, the abrupt reversal of the eight big tech companies' momentum last year changed their profiles, according to the S&P Indices algorithms. Now, the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index includes just one: Apple. Despite periodic setbacks such as the decline in sales and earnings it announced Feb. 2, it has for the most part kept growing.

How are the others classified? The answer isn't simple. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft now reside in both of the two, more inclusive, S&P 500 growth and value indexes: subsets of the S&P 500 that welcome stocks near the middle of the growth-value spectrum. Netflix, Nvidia and Tesla are only in the broad growth index, implying that they have retained more growth characteri­stics than Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft.

The shifts are dizzying. They amount to a wholesale transforma­tion of nearly a third of the market weight of the S&P 500 growth and value indexes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States