The Mercury News

Feds deny state's bullet train funding request

California commission had applied for about $1.2 billion in grants

- By Tim Sheehan

California's controvers­ial bullet-train project has been passed over by the federal government in its efforts to secure about $1.2 billion to continue constructi­on in the central San Joaquin Valley.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority had applied last year for about $1.2 billion in competitiv­e grants from two different programs under the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastruc­ture Law. But the authority struck out on both, according to grant announceme­nts made last month by the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion.

“We were disappoint­ed not to receive a grant in this particular round,” Brian Annis, the rail agency's chief financial officer, told The Fresno Bee in a telephone interview.

The missed grants were part of the federal Multimodal Project Disciplina­ry Grant program, nicknamed MEGA. But Annis noted that the agency had previously received money, although in smaller amounts, from other federal grant programs.

Constructi­on is currently underway on about 119 miles of the planned high-speed rail route from north of Madera to northwest of Bakersfiel­d. The MEGA applicatio­ns sought more than $1.2 billion.

“While it is disappoint­ing not to receive a MEGA grant this round, only nine recipients nationwide were awarded funding out of the hundreds that applied,” a spokespers­on for the rail authority said. “The authority remains optimistic that our strong partnershi­p with the Biden-Harris administra­tion will result in continued joint investment from the Infrastruc­ture Investment and Jobs Act, from which the authority has already received grant funding.”

Annis said the first round of MEGA grants awarded nationwide amounted to about $1.2 billion, “so we asked for more than they awarded in total.”

“California as a whole did not do too well in MEGA, just a single award of $30 million to a project in Santa Cruz,” he added.

While the California HighSpeed Rail Authority missed out on the first big grants for which it applied, “we're not slowing down work,” Annis said. “We're continuing full steam ahead for the Merced-to-Bakersfiel­d project.”

But, “we do need federal funds to complete the full scope for the Merced-Bakersfiel­d project,” he added. “Getting (federal money) does definitely accelerate our project. If we don't, at some point it's going to slow us down.”

The next opportunit­y for the rail authority to seek federal money is in April, the deadline set by the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion for applicatio­ns to the Federal-State Partnershi­p for Intercity Passenger Rail.

That five-year program has about $36 billion available, of which two-thirds is earmarked for the Northeast Corridor from New England to Washington, D.C. The remaining $12 billion will be up for grabs in an applicatio­n process in which the California HighSpeed Rail Authority must compete against other passenger rail projects across the country.

The Federal Railroad Administra­tion announced that it has added almost $2.3 billion to the pot, bringing the total available in the first year of funding to more than $4.5 billion outside of the Northeast Corridor, according to the Federal Register.

More rounds of the MEGA grants are also coming up over the next few years, and Annis said California will put in applicatio­ns for those as well.

“There is no doubt that we want federal money, that we need federal money,” Annis said. When Propositio­n 1A, a $9.9 billion bond act for high-speed rail, was approved by California voters in 2008, state rail leaders expected the federal government to pitch in between one-third and one-half of the total project cost for a full 520-mile system linking San Francisco and Los Angeles via Fresno and the San Joaquin Valley.

But cost estimates have fluctuated wildly since California received about $3.5 billion in federal railroad and economic stimulus funds in 2010 and 2011. A statewide system at one time expected to cost somewhere around $43 billion; that later ballooned to almost $100 billion before the state rail agency sought ways to use “value engineerin­g” to bring the costs back down.

The most recent cost estimate for the planned Merced-Bakersfiel­d operationa­l segment is about $24 billion, according to the California High-Speed Rail Authority's 2022 business plan sent to the state Legislatur­e last year.

“We do need federal funds to complete the full scope for the Merced-Bakersfiel­d project,” Annis said. “It's very important that we win some big awards here in the upcoming grant cycles.”

Constructi­on beyond the San Joaquin Valley — east to San Jose and San Francisco and south to Palmdale, Burbank, Los Angeles and Anaheim — is very much a wild card not only in terms of scheduling and when future money might become available, but also cost.

Depending on the complexity of constructi­on and uncertaint­y of such costs as buying property for right of way, tunneling through the Coast Range toward San Jose and the Tehachapi and San Gabriel mountain ranges toward Los Angeles, the agency's 2022 business plan estimated the price tag for a full San Francisco-to-Los Angeles/Anaheim system range from a low of $72.3 billion to as much as $105.1 billion.

 ?? ROBERT GAUTHIER — LOS ANGELES TIMES ?? A constructi­on wokers walks on the Fresno Trench section of the California High Speed Rail Project in April 2019. Constructi­on is currently taking place on about 119miles of the planned route from north of Madera to northwest of Bakersfiel­d. A request for federal funding has been denied.
ROBERT GAUTHIER — LOS ANGELES TIMES A constructi­on wokers walks on the Fresno Trench section of the California High Speed Rail Project in April 2019. Constructi­on is currently taking place on about 119miles of the planned route from north of Madera to northwest of Bakersfiel­d. A request for federal funding has been denied.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States