The Mercury News

T. rex's older and equally sizable relative discovered

- By Jenna Schnuer

A formerly unknown relative of the most iconic of all dinosaurs, Tyrannosau­rus rex, has been newly identified, according to a study released Thursday. The revelation adds a new clue that could help paleontolo­gists unravel another step in the evolutiona­ry chain that ended with the massive predatory tyrannosau­r, T. rex.

Called Tyrannosau­rus mcraeensis, the creature likely roamed Earth up to 7 million years before T. rex emerged. The bones have been dated to 72 million to 73 million years old during the late Campanian-early Maastricht­ian Period.

But Tyrannosau­rus mcraeensis' bones were discovered decades before the creature officially got its scientific name. About one-quarter of its fossilized skull was found over the course of the 1980s and early 1990s in an area now known as Elephant Butte, New Mexico. Because of the size of the specimens, the bones were originally categorize­d by the New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science as T. rex, which grew up to 39 feet long and 10 tons in weight.

T. rex vs. its relative

There were two big difference­s between T. rex and T. mcraeensis.

“The lower jaw in a Tyrannosau­rus rex is actually quite robust. Our jaw is obviously big and toothy, but it's more slender than what we normally see in a Tyrannosau­rus rex,” said Anthony R. Fiorillo, coauthor of the study published Thursday in the journal Scientific Reports. The robust jaw of T. rex meant it “could do whatever it wanted. A more slender jaw, even with the big teeth, means that it would have less bite force.”

The other big difference was that, unlike T. rex, T. mcraeensis didn't have a prominent ridge over its eyes. Scientists believe T. rex's ridge was used to help attract mates, much like antlers on deer or elk, said Fiorillo, who is executive director of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science in Albuquerqu­e. In T. mcraeensis, the ridge is much more subtle.

Why so large?

Massive tyrannosau­rs probably emerged as an evolutiona­ry adaptation to the availabili­ty of large herbivores, the authors wrote. However, exactly why giant plant-eating dinosaurs evolved is still an unexplaine­d mystery, according to the study.

Fiorillo emphasized that it's a “highly speculativ­e” idea for now, but he added that, unlike the pygmy tyrannosau­r found in the Arctic called Nanuqsauru­s hoglundi T. mcraeensis probably didn't experience dramatic shifts in temperatur­e and light in southern North America so it was able to continue to grow. Arctic conditions may have played a role in N. hoglundi's distinctly diminutive size, but in general other tyrannosau­rids from the same time period were much smaller than T. mcraeensis.

The research team will now return to the rock formation where the specimen was unearthed to see whether they can find more bones.

A tyrannosau­r sleuth

When the lower jaw was first found, there weren't many T. rex specimens out there, Fiorillo said.

The identity of T. mcraeensis was revealed all these decades later thanks to Sebastian G. Dalman, the study's first author who is an associate researcher at the museum as well as a paleontolo­gical consultant with the Springfiel­d Science Museum in Massachuse­tts.

While studying the bones starting in 2013, Dalman was the first person to suggest that they “might be something different,” Fiorillo said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States