The Mercury News

All AI-generated work must be identified as such

- By Roxane Gay Roxane Gay is the author, most recently, of “Hunger” and a contributi­ng opinion writer. Send questions about the office, money, careers and work-life balance to workfriend@nytimes.com. Include your name and location, or a request to remain a

I am a senior lead and manage large, complex projects and teams. My organizati­on has a thorough review process for all projects, with many quality enhancemen­t steps. I recently noticed colleagues are sending ChatGPT-generated responses without acknowledg­ing that they were generated by artificial intelligen­ce.

I support the use of AI to improve efficiency, but this sort of review has the opposite effect: The AIgenerate­d response does not take into account previous discussion­s/decisions during the review process and can generate unnecessar­y busy work.

Are other organizati­ons seeing this sort of internal use of AI? And what is the best way to broach this subject without causing a negative reaction?

— Anonymous

A

Many organizati­ons are grappling with how to manage artificial intelligen­ce in the workplace. The next time someone turns in work generated by AI without an appropriat­e acknowledg­ment, simply tell them that moving forward, they need to identify all AIgenerate­d work. But it's also important to take a more expansive approach. Collaborat­e with relevant stakeholde­rs to develop AI guidelines that reflect the realities of the work your organizati­on does. When is it appropriat­e for employees to use AI? How should they acknowledg­e and cite AI-generated work? When is using the technology not appropriat­e? What are the consequenc­es for employees who do not follow these guidelines? How are you going to train staff to use AI? How are you going to train managers to identify work that is generated by it? AI is an imperfect tool, however exciting its potential might be. We need to think carefully about the ethics of using it.

QI've been in the same office for more than 25 years, and I'm largely self-taught. Because I've shown a willingnes­s to learn independen­tly, whenever we have new tools or changes to existing tools it's assumed I don't need training. I'm also expected to train new employees. However, because I'm selftaught I have trouble articulati­ng steps. Are there resources that can help with this? I sincerely want to give others the sort of help I haven't always received myself. — Anonymous

A

Don't be so hard on yourself. Training and instructio­nal design are specific areas of expertise. If your employer expects you to train new employees, ask if they will support your profession­al developmen­t and pay for you to take an instructio­nal design course or workshop. There are also many books you may find helpful, such as Cathy Moore's “Map It: The Hands-On Guide to Strategic

Training Design” and “Design for How People Learn” by Julie Dirksen. As you start to develop resources, think, what are the most important things people need to know about using these tools? How can you best communicat­e that informatio­n to new learners? Good luck!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States