The Mercury News

Top cybersecur­ity job has been vacant for nearly 2 years

- By Khari Johnson

You might think the home of Silicon Valley would rush to hire a cybersecur­ity chief, but you'd be wrong: California has left its top cybersecur­ity post vacant for nearly two years.

A spokespers­on said there is no current timeline for Gov. Gavin Newsom to appoint anyone for the position, commander for the Cybersecur­ity Integratio­n Center.

“We are a target,” as a tech industry leader, the most populous state in the country, one of the busiest ports in the world and the fifth largest economy in the world, former cybersecur­ity integratio­n center commander Jonathan Nunez said in a video posted to YouTube two years ago. He took the helm in June 2020 and was the last commander appointed by Newsom, leaving the position in June 2022.

State officials say the vacancy hasn't hampered the state's ability to respond to threats, but experts outside the state government are concerned that an acting commander is spread thin.

The commander job entails assisting law enforcemen­t agencies with criminal investigat­ions and safeguardi­ng California's economy and critical infrastruc­ture. Other job duties include maintainin­g a security operation center that disseminat­es actionable informatio­n to all state entities, forming public and private partnershi­ps and developing state cybersecur­ity strategy. The commander is paid a salary of up to $187,000 a year.

The challenge of a position like cybersecur­ity commander is it's not a matter of public or media interest until something goes wrong, said Dan Schnur, a former spokespers­on for Gov. Pete Wilson who now teaches political communicat­ion at USC and UC Berkeley. There's no set timeline for appointmen­ts and depends almost entirely upon the urgency to fill the job and quality of applicants, but in his experience, taking more than a year to appoint is an unusually long amount of time.

“Either they're going through a painstakin­g process to pick the right person or it slipped through the cracks and there's no way to know which of the two it is,” he said. “Unless you find a unicorn who's willing to forego that kind of financial compensati­on in exchange for public service, you're already starting out with a compromise.”

There have been four full-time commanders prior to the current acting commander.

Keith Tresh was appointed by former Gov. Jerry Brown and acted as commander from 2016 to 2018. He is now chief informatio­n security officer at consultanc­y firm AMEG. Mario Garcia served as acting commander from 2018 to 2020 and now works as state coordinato­r for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecur­ity and Infrastruc­ture Security Agency. Nunez was appointed by Newsom in 2020 and now works as an analyst at consultanc­y firm Gartner. David Lane served as acting commander for an unspecifie­d period of time in 2022. Deputy Director of homeland security Tom Osbone also is the acting commander.

Tresh previously served as chief informatio­n security officer for California and Idaho and was the first Cybersecur­ity Integratio­n Center commander. He said he jumped at the opportunit­y because the job acts as a second set of eyes for public institutio­ns like city and county government­s, not just the state of California.

“We helped school districts and regional transit authoritie­s when they had breaches,” he said. “That's why I think it's absolutely a perfect position to continue on.”

Cyber attacks on public institutio­ns like local government­s, hospitals, and school districts are on the rise. Hospitals and health care providers still are recovering from a ransomware attack that affected payment processing for Change Healthcare, which processes roughly half of all health care claims and payments nationwide.

The Cybersecur­ity Integratio­n Center receives reports when a school district, state agency or private company experience­s a data breach. The center also receives threat reports from federal agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion, the Cybersecur­ity and Infrastruc­ture Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.

Brown created the cybersecur­ity agency in 2015 to operate within the governor's Office of Emergency Services. It works with the Department of Technology to investigat­e and report incidents and helps restore operations after an attack. Director Liana Bailey-Crimmins said in an interview in February that her agency works closely with the office of emergency services to address the needs of the state as they fill key positions so they never miss a step.

A spokespers­on for the governor's Office of Emergency Services said Osborne is serving as acting commander while the governor carries out a nationwide search for a qualified candidate.

Over the course of the past month CalMatters repeatedly asked details about data breach reports and compliance with additional duties assigned to the commander and cybersecur­ity integratio­n center by a five-year cybersecur­ity plan approved in 2021, but received no comment.

The last time the state compiled a report detailing the kinds of data breaches, number of records compromise­d, and number of California­ns affected in cyber attacks was in 2016, before the cybersecur­ity integratio­n center existed.

CalMatters reached out to the office of Attorney General Rob Bonta for the latest data breach report. The attorney general's office referred CalMatters to the cybersecur­ity center, which did not share new informatio­n but said it would post new data publicly later “this spring.”

After audits found that state agencies were woefully unprepared for cyberattac­ks, California Assemblyme­mber Jacqui Irwin, a Democrat from Thousand Oaks, coauthored a 2018 law that made the Cybersecur­ity Integratio­n Center a permanent state agency and required developmen­t of a state cybersecur­ity strategy. Irwin, who is also chairperso­n of the Assembly cybersecur­ity committee, said in a statement that finding a new commander has not been easy.

“The state has struggled to recruit and retain cybersecur­ity specialist­s, just as many businesses have, with their skill set in high-demand,” she said.

Competitio­n with private sector

Former state cybersecur­ity employees said they think it's difficult for the cybersecur­ity center to keep commanders because the pay is less than for similar jobs in the private sector. State employees may treat an acting commander — who will be in the job temporaril­y — differentl­y than a commander appointed by Newsom.

A former cybersecur­ity center employee who spoke on background for fear of profession­al reprisals said the biggest issue with the position is lack of real authority; the commander has limited capacity to act and hold people accountabl­e.

Public agencies, especially in California, are major targets for cybercrimi­nals seeking confidenti­al informatio­n or just want to cause panic, said Steven Ward, a cybersecur­ity fellow at center-right think tank R Street Institute and former digital forensics examiner for law enforcemen­t agencies in Sacramento.

Ward said the vacancy is reflective of a number of trends: First, the cybersecur­ity threat landscape moves quickly, and public agencies move slowly. Second, it mirrors a larger cybersecur­ity workforce shortage. California has the second-highest in the U.S., according to a 2022 report by the nonprofit Internatio­nal Informatio­n System Security Certificat­ion Consortium.

Third, public agencies can't compete with pay and benefits offered by private companies. Another 2022 study found that the private sector pays 14% more than government agencies. The pay gap creates a situation in which entry-level employees are responsibl­e for guarding highly sensitive systems.

“It definitely needs to be filled,” he said. “It's important that this type of work continues without interrupti­ons.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States