Court: Arizona citizenship proof law illegal
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot on their own require wouldbe voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.
The justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizona’s voterapproved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal “Motor Voter” voter registration law.
Federal law “precludes Arizona from requiring a federal form applicant to submit information beyond that required by the form itself,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the court’s majority.
The court was considering the legality of Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal “motor voter” registration law. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which doesn’t require such documentation, trumps Arizona’s Proposition 200 passed in 2004.
Arizona appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.
“Today’s decision sends a strong message that states cannot block their citizens from registering to vote by superimposing burdensome paperwork requirements on top of federal law,” said Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and lead counsel for the voters who challenged Proposition 200.
“The Supreme Court has affirmed that all U.S. citizens have the right to register to vote using the national postcard, regardless of the state in which they live,” she said.
But Tom Caso, a professor at Chapman University School of Law in California, said the decision “opened the door” to noncitizen voting. “The court’s decision ignores the clear dictates of the Constitution in favor of bureaucratic red tape,” Caso said.
Kathy McKee, who led the push to get the proposition on the ballot in Arizona, said the ruling makes it harder to combat voter fraud, including fraud carried out by people who don’t have permission to be in the country. “To even suggest that the honor system works, really?” McKee said. “You have to prove who you are just to use your charge card now.”
The case focuses on Arizona, which has tangled frequently with the federal government over immigration issues involving the Mexican border. But it has broader implications because four other states — Alabama, Georgia, Kansas and Tennessee — have similar requirements, and 12 other states are contemplating such legislation.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the court’s ruling.
The Constitution “authorizes states to deter- mine the qualifications of voters in federal elections, which necessarily includes the related power to determine whether those qualifications are satisfied,” Thomas said in his dissent.
Opponents of Arizona’s law see it as an attack on vulnerable voter groups such as minorities, immigrants and the elderly. They say they’ve counted more than 31,000 potentially legal voters in Arizona who easily could have registered before Proposition 200 but were blocked initially by the law in the 20 months after it passed in 2004. They say about 20 percent of those thwarted were Latino.
Barbara Arnwine, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, called the decision a victory. “The court has reaffirmed the essential American right to register to vote for federal elec- tion without the burdens of state voter suppression measures,” she said.
But Arizona officials say they should be able to pass laws to stop illegal immigrants and other noncitizens from getting on their voting rolls. The Arizona voting law was part of a package that also denied some government benefits to illegal immigrants and required Arizonans to show identification before voting.
The federal “motor voter” law, enacted in 1993 to expand voter registration, requires states to offer voter registration when a resident applies for a driver’s license or certain benefits. Another provision of that law — the one at issue before the court — requires states to allow would-be voters to fill out mail-in registration cards and swear they are citizens under penalty of perjury, but it doesn’t require them to show proof. Under Proposition 200, Arizona officials require an Arizona driver’s license issued after 1996, a U.S. birth certificate, a passport or other similar document, or the state will reject the federal registration application form.
While the court was clear in stating that states cannot add additional identification requirements to the federal forms on their own, it was also clear that the same actions can be taken by state governments if they get the approval of the federal government and the federal courts.
Arizona can ask the federal government to include the extra documents as a state-specific requirement, Scalia said, and take any decision made by the government on that request back to court. Other states have already done so, Scalia said.
The Election Assistance Commission “recently approved a state-specific instruction for Louisiana requiring applicants who lack a Louisiana driver’s license, ID card or Social Security number to attach additional documentation to the completed federal form,” Scalia said.
Currently, the Election Assistance Commission doesn’t have any active commissioners. The four commissioners are supposed to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The last two commissioners, Donetta L. Davidson and Gineen Bresso, left in 2011, according to the EAC website.
“The notion that the court will not enforce the Constitution unless you first apply to a commission that cannot act because it has no members is mind boggling,” Caso said.
Voting rights advocates immediately called on future EAC commissioners to reject any requests to add identification documents to the federal voter registration form.
“Federal law already provides enough protection, and states should not be unduly burdening eligible citizens who want to register to vote,” Advancement Project Co-Director Penda D. Hair said.
The case is 12-71, Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
By Bernice Bede Osol Tuesday, June 18, 2013
In the year ahead, you could have an unusually strong attraction to many new interests and activities. This new, refurbished outlook will liberate you from old, negative attitudes and add excitement to your life.
GEMINI (May 21-June 20) -Anyone who teams up with you to handle a bold, imaginative endeavor will be considered lucky. You’ll provide the needed know-how for success.
CANCER (June 21-July 22) -- The welfare of others is likely to be your prime concern. However, even though this is a noble effort, you’ll derive some fringe benefits from your selflessness.
LEO (July 23-Aug. 22) -- You’re presently in a cycle where you could realize more than a few hopes and desires. However, nothing will be simply handed to you, you’ll have to work hard for your rewards.
VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22) -- Who you know and what you know will prove of immeasurable help in a complicated undertaking. You’ll need to utilize both to achieve maximum results.
LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 23) -- You have a knack for improving upon the ideas of others. You should have ample raw material to draw from at present, and you’ll be able make some impressive achievements.
SCORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22) -Joint ventures look to be especially promising. You’ll be in a position to successfully help further something initiated by another, and you’ll come out ahead in the process.
SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 23-Dec. 21) -- Friends will find you to be refreshingly honest. Because you’ll compliment only those who deserve praise, what you say will have impact. CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19) -- You’re in a very good achievement cycle, so don’t waste your valuable time on insignificant objectives. Go after only the biggest game.
AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 19) -That wheel of fortune seems to be spinning in your direction. What it can do for you first needs to be recognized and then taken advantage of, so be alert.
PISCES (Feb. 20-March 20) -Some fortunate developments might occur that won’t be orchestrated by you, yet will produce advantages as if you had personally designed them.
ARIES (March 21-April 19) -- If you have something that needs to be worked out, avoid discussing it with the multitude, which would only prove confusing. Select a confidant who keeps his or her head on straight.
TAURUS (April 20-May 20) -Instead of asking someone to take care of an issue that could affect your security, do it yourself. You’ll handle things better on your own. COPYRIGHT 2013 Feature Syndicate, Inc. DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK FOR UFS
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500
United