The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Members of Congress, get out of town and gain perspectiv­e

- David Shribman Ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government. Ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would, like Esau, sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money. Is there a single vir

Well, that’s a bit harsh, but only a wee bit. Yet that excerpt from Oliver Cromwell’s 1653 speech, in which he described lawmakers as having “contempt of all virtue” and in which he dissolved the famous Rump Parliament, is not totally inappropri­ate for our time, three and three-quarter centuries later.

Because of all the wretched ideas that have come out of Washington this year, one of the worst is the notion — first proposed by a president frustrated with Capitol Hill’s paralysis on health care and the Democrats’ success in blocking his appointmen­ts — that Congress should stay in Washington rather than disperse for its summer holiday.

There is some poetic justice in making the members of the House and Senate swelter in the capital’s relentless August heat and labor under the remorseles­s blanket of humidity that descends on the city.

I admit, it is an appealing thought. But Cromwell’s indictment, and his verdict that “you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redressed (and) are yourselves become the greatest grievance,” are the very reason members of Congress should go on vacation.

The Founders worried that members of Congress might drift far from the public, its sentiments and interests, a concern that political figures on the left and on the right have cited across the generation­s. More recently, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, a devout conservati­ve, has written that the Founders believed that “(f)reedom itself depended on an elected legislatur­e of citizen lawmakers.”

A study released early this year by the internatio­nal market-research firm GfK showed that the city where people took the fewest days off was Washington, D.C., which gives the lie to the notion that the capital is full of slackers.

The point is that the nation’s lawmakers would be better served by spending some time in mountainsi­de contemplat­ion or lakeside leisure than by spending an additional fortnight hearing mind-numbing legislativ­e mumbo-jumbo, fighting over rules of order, fulminatin­g at cable hosts, obsessing over presidenti­al tweets and preparing statements seeking to explain the inexplicab­le to the incredulou­s.

Nor would it hurt members of Congress to walk the streets of their hometowns and encounter the members of the public who sent them to Washington, only to see them bicker among themselves and belittle each other. Yes, they just recently had a recess. But truly they cannot be amid the people too often.

The work will always be there, and in most cases — perhaps not on health care, where additional hearings might be of value — the work can be accomplish­ed in a fraction of the time Congress usually consumes. Here’s advice from the pages of the Harvard Business Review: “If you plan ahead, create social connection­s on the trip, go far from your work and feel safe, 94 percent of vacations have a good (return on investment) in terms of your energy and outlook upon returning to work.”

So, members of Congress: Take a swim. Take a hike. Awaken to the sunrise and gaze at the sunset. Hold a town meeting or two and keep your ears, and your mind, open. Listen, too, to Cromwell: “Go, get you out! Make haste! Ye venal slaves be gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!”

 ??  ?? David Shribman Columnist
David Shribman Columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States