The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

1 year into Russia probe, Washington is rattled, uncertain

- By Mary Clare Jalonick and Eric Tucker

WASHINGTON » Unlike the president, Robert Mueller hasn’t uttered one word in public about his Russia investigat­ion in the year since he was appointed special counsel. And that is rattling just about everyone involved.

What’s he up to? When will he bring the probe to an end?

He doesn’t have to say, and he’s not.

A year into the investigat­ion, the stern-looking prosecutor is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. In that time, the breadth and stealth of investigat­ions surroundin­g Trump have unsettled the White House and its chief occupant, and have spread to Capitol Hill, K Street, foreign government­s and, as late as last week, corporate boardrooms.

With lawmakers eying midterm elections and President Donald Trump publicly mulling whether he will sit for an interview with Mueller, Republican calls are growing for the special counsel to end his investigat­ion. Vice President Mike Pence and others have said it publicly. GOP lawmakers insist they’ve seen no evidence of collusion between Russians and Trump’s 2016 election campaign.

The longer the investigat­ion runs, those calls are likely to amplify.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, who has steadfastl­y supported the special counsel, seemed to change his tone a bit Thursday.

“I think he should be free to do his job, but I would like to see it get wrapped up, of course,” Ryan said of Mueller. “I mean we want to see this thing come to its conclusion, but again I’ve always said he should be free to finish his job.”

Mueller is investigat­ing Russian interferen­ce in the election, whether Trump’s campaign was involved and possible obstructio­n of justice. And by the standards of previous special counsel investigat­ions, his actually has so far gone fairly quickly. Since he was appointed on May 17, 2017, Mueller’s office has charged 19 people and three Russian companies. He has charged four Trump campaign advisers, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn and ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The probe has also ensnared countless Washington insiders who have been called to testify or found themselves under scrutiny, including lobbyists and foreign representa­tives who may have illegally sought to influence the administra­tion. Large corporatio­ns like AT&T and Novartis have been contacted by Mueller and caught up in an offshoot investigat­ion into Trump’s longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen. The companies acknowledg­ed last week that they paid Cohen for “insight” in the early days of the Trump administra­tion.

While Mueller himself still enjoys generally broad bipartisan support in Congress, particular­ly in the Senate, the secrecy of the investigat­ion has created some anxiety about what is next.

“The American people are curious about what happened,” says Sen. John Kennedy, R-La. “And everything so far that has supposedly come out about it has been speculatio­n and conjecture and rumor — and the truth is nobody really knows what Mr. Mueller and his team are thinking.”

The president’s lawyers have rushed to fill that vacuum, recently suggesting they’ve been told Mueller won’t indict Trump and couldn’t force the president to comply with an interview. Personal attorney Rudy Giuliani suggested that a recent conversati­on with Mueller’s team led him to believe the special counsel, citing a Justice Department opinion, had ruled out the possibilit­y of trying to indict a sitting president.

Trump has seemed confident of that on Twitter, where he frequently throws barbs at the investigat­ion — a strategy that is increasing­ly resonating with many Republican­s. On Thursday, he marked the anniversar­y by calling the probe a “disgusting, illegal and unwarrante­d Witch Hunt.”

But while he calls for an end to the investigat­ion, Trump’s own indecision over an interview remains the most visible impediment to a speedy conclusion of at least one key part.

Mueller asked to interview the president months ago, but the Trump legal team has struggled to formally make a decision. The president has publicly said he wants to talk to Mueller, only to demur, citing his lawyers. Last week, Giuliani told The Associated Press the decision would be delayed at least another month until after a June 12 summit with North Korea.

Giuliani said Mueller has indicated to the legal team that he’s “pretty much finished,” with the exception of the president’s interview.

“As far as we know, we’re basically the last witness,” Giuliani said.

Beyond that, the endgame remains unclear. A final report from Mueller could go to Congress — a move that would become more significan­t if Democrats win control in this year’s elections.

It’s unclear how much insight the Trump legal team has into Mueller’s timing. As in most major investigat­ions, his office does not leak, and his spokesmen decline to comment on nearly every news story. Mueller is barely even photograph­ed — forcing news outlets to run the same photos and videos over and over again, of Mueller on Capitol Hill or heading to work.

Instead, the few public glimpses into the special counsel’s work come from witnesses who are interviewe­d, attorneys and court filings made in the publicly filed criminal cases.

It’s also unclear how important the issue is to voters back home.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States