State that extols outsiders considers an insider for president
When, 120 years ago, the New Hampshire poet Edna Dean Proctor saluted this state’s “cliffs, her meads, her brooks afoam” and spoke elegiacally of the “whiterobed heights” of its mountains, she identified perhaps the mostly enduring characteristic of New Hampshire — its worship of the outside.
And now, as the 2020 presidential campaign cranks to an opening in the state that holds the first primary of the political season, one major question persists: Will a state that extols the virtues of the outside embrace an insider for the White House?
Will New Hampshire grant its Democratic National Convention delegates to a neighbor such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, whose principal residence is but 30 miles from the New Hampshire border?
Or will the Democrats instead side with a true outsider like the two little-known municipal leaders contemplating presidential campaigns, Mayor Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles and former Mayor Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans?
New Hampshirites customarily regard Massachusetts residents as outsiders, and not welcome ones; the most expensive act on a highway here is driving in a car with red-on-white Bay State plates, magnets for state patrollers looking for speeders or, more precisely, for any excuse to torment a Massachusetts driver.
And yet in politics, New Hampshire voters, recipients of a constant diet of news from Boston television stations, have been remarkably congenial to Massachusetts presidential candidates, virtually considering them one of their own. Bay State candidates John F. Kennedy (1960), Michael Dukakis (1988), Paul Tsongas (1992), John Kerry (2004) and Mitt Romney (2012) all won the New Hampshire primary.
So Warren has an edge in this contest.
Now the second question: Can she, elected twice to the Senate and with the advantage/disadvantage of having served on the faculty of the Harvard Law School plausibly portray herself as an outsider?
Her best bet: Emphasize her gender and her views, both departures from American political custom.
Indeed, it is possible to argue that since the pre-Civil War years, the Democrats have elected only two true insiders to the White House, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Kennedy.
(In an intriguing twist of history, both FDR and JFK, elected president with the nomination of the self-styled “party of the people,” were aristocrats.)
Determined to prevent Trump from winning a second term, Democrats here and elsewhere are priding themselves on examining the candidates with sedulous care, looking less to ideology than to electability.
The ideology factor may aid Warren, or Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, or many others such as Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York or Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, plus a passel of relative newcomers whose views match the new generation of voters — vigilant about civil rights, troubled about the wealth gap, concerned about climate change, determined to win single-payer health care.
The winnability factor may favor former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who is not alone in believing he has the best chance of toppling Trump.
The result is a Democratic dilemma unlike any it has encountered before.
And it comes at a time when it is prudent to remember that it is not the Democrats but the Republicans who for the past century have tended to elect insider candidates such as, among others, Herbert Hoover (the longest-serving secretary of commerce), Richard Nixon (victorious in House and Senate races, two terms as vice president) and George H.W. Bush (member of the House, director of the CIA, veteran diplomat, two terms as vice president).
The only modern exception until recently was Wendell Willkie (1940).
Plus one other: Donald Trump.