The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Likely deal would give Trump fraction of desired wall money

- By Alan Fram and Andrew Taylor

WASHINGTON >> Congressio­nal bargainers are working toward a border security deal amid indication­s that the White House is preparing to accept a bipartisan agreement that would give President Donald Trump a fraction of the money he’s demanded for his proposed southern border wall.

Participan­ts said they expect money for physical barriers to end up well below the $5.7 billion that Trump has sought to begin constructi­on of the wall, which has attained iconic significan­ce for him and his conservati­ve supporters. Underscori­ng the clout he’s lost during a battle that’s dominated the opening weeks of divided government, the amount seems sure to fall much closer to $1.6 billion, the participan­ts said, a figure that was in a bipartisan Senate bill last year.

“That’s what we’re working toward,” said Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., one bargainer.

An agreement would also avert a new partial federal shutdown next weekend. Trump has warned he might trigger a new closure of agencies if he doesn’t get his way, but that threat has become toothless because of solid opposition from GOP lawmakers burned by the record 35-day closure that he initiated in December.

One White House aide said Trump was expected to back whatever compromise emerges and acknowledg­ed there is no will among congressio­nal Republican­s for another shutdown. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal discussion­s.

Coupled with a widespread expectatio­n that the agreement would not use the term “wall,” the pact would represent a significan­t retreat for Trump, for whom “Build the wall!” has been a battle cry since his presidenti­al campaign.

Democrats seemed to draw a firm line on spending.

“Throughout the talks, Democrats have insisted that a border security compromise not be overly reliant on physical barriers,” said Evan Hollander, spokesman for Democrats who control the House Appropriat­ions Committee. “We will not agree to $2 billion in funding for barriers.”

In another signal that Trump was reluctantl­y preparing to give ground, the White House has been considerin­g accepting the deal but also using executive action

to secure additional barrier funding without lawmakers’ approval. That plan was described by two people familiar with White House thinking who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. Depending on what Trump does, such an action could spark lawsuits or congressio­nal votes of disapprova­l.

Trump supporters have said there are other executive powers Trump could use to divert money from the budget to wall constructi­on, though it was unclear if they would face challenges in Congress or the courts. One provision of the law lets the Defense Department provide support for counter-drug activities.

Besides the dollar figure, talks were focusing on the type and location of barriers, participan­ts said. Also in play were the number of beds the federal Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agency could have for detained migrants and the amount of aid included for natural disaster relief.

Money for high-tech surveillan­ce equipment and more personnel was also expected to be included.

No one ruled out lastminute problems, especially with Trump’s penchant for head-snapping turnabouts. But the momentum was clearly toward clinching an agreement that Congress could pass by next Friday. The next day, many government agencies would run out of money and have to close again without a deal.

Rep. Mark Meadows, RN.C., who leads the hardright House Freedom Caucus, said he spoke Thursday night to Trump, who he said was in “wait and see” mode. Meadows said he expects an agreement to provide an amount closer to $1.6 billion.

“I’m not optimistic it’ll be something the president can support,” Meadows said.

A conservati­ve House GOP aide said Freedom Caucus members wanted at least $2 billion for barriers and no restrictio­ns on new constructi­on, land acquisitio­n or new types of barriers that could be built.

The aide also said the agreement need not contain the term “wall,” a word that Trump has lately alternated between embracing and abandoning. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private talks.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? In this photo, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the top Republican on the bipartisan group bargainers working to craft a border security compromise in hope of avoiding another government shutdown, is joined by Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., left, and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., right, as they speak with reporters in Washington. Congressio­nal bargainers seem close to clinching a border security agreement that would avert a fresh government shutdown, with leaders of both parties voicing optimism and the top GOP negotiator saying he believes President Donald Trump would back the emerging accord.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS In this photo, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the top Republican on the bipartisan group bargainers working to craft a border security compromise in hope of avoiding another government shutdown, is joined by Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., left, and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., right, as they speak with reporters in Washington. Congressio­nal bargainers seem close to clinching a border security agreement that would avert a fresh government shutdown, with leaders of both parties voicing optimism and the top GOP negotiator saying he believes President Donald Trump would back the emerging accord.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States