The Mercury (Pottstown, PA)

Board votes 4-1 to sell sewer system

- By Evan Brandt ebrandt@21st-centurymed­ @PottstownN­ews on Twitter

UPPER POTTSGROVE » Township Commission­ers voted 4-1 Monday night to sell the township’s sewer collection system for $13.75 million to Pennsylvan­ia American Water.

Commission­ers Martin Schreiber cast the lone vote against the sale.

As The Mercury reported on April 8, the presentati­on provided at four online informatio­nal sessions earlier in the month forecast that sewer rates would drop by about 9.6 percent under Pennsylvan­ia American Water ownership.

However, the decrease — from the current $71.87 per month to

$65 per month — would be short-lived, according to Bernie Grundusky, senior director for business developmen­t for the water company.

A chart he shared as part of the online meetings showed rates would return to the current rate in three or four years after the sale, and then increase annually by an average of 4.5 to 5.2 percent.

By comparison, the township’s sewer rates, which have increased in a more haphazard fashion, average out to between 4.6 to 6 percent a year, according to the presentati­on.

Now that the sale has been approved, the average homeowner will save $1,260 between the time rates were dropped to when they return to their current level, according to the presentati­on.

The deal must still be approved by the Pennsylvan­ia Public Utility Commission, a process that could take longer than a year to be finalized.

As a result of the vote, PFM Financial Advisors LLC will be paid more than $250,000.

As noted by Commission­ers’ Chairman Trace Slinkerd, who, prior to the vote, praised the consultant­s for taking a risk, if the commission­ers had voted against the sale, PFM would have been paid only its $7,500 fee for preliminar­y work.

Scott Shearer, managing director of PFM, insisted during Monday’s meeting that the firm “did not make a recommenda­tion. We’re not trying to sell this system.”

During the four public informatio­n sessions the township staged online, not one negative aspect of the sale was identified. Township Manager Michelle Reddick said the presentati­ons were put together by PFM and the staff. During those meetings, Slinkerd restricted all interactio­n to questions from residents, which were mostly answered by the consultant­s or township staff. He said public comments would be accepted at the April 20 meeting. When that happened Monday night, the online meeting was attended by more than 50 people. Eight residents spoke. All but one asked the commission­ers to vote against the sale or, even more frequently, delay the vote until next month or later. Many cited the fact that the Pennsylvan­ia American Water’s bid does not expire until June 30, and there is still time to answer residents’ questions. Don Read, a former member of the Pottstown Borough Authority and a current member of the township’s sewer committee, was the only person to speak fully in favor of the sale. As he did at the April 16 meeting, Read said the best reason to sell the system is the risk inherent in running it. He said the potential capital costs of problems with sewer lines and pump stations, as well as capital costs imposed by the Pottstown Borough Authority, which runs the plant that receives and treats Upper Pottsgrove’s sewage, are too big a financial risk for a four-person staff. “The price is on the high side of what we projected,” he said of the winning bid. The other bidder was Aqua America. “What’s another month going to do? It’s frustratin­g to watch people come in at the last hour and ask for a delay,” said Read. He was referring, presumably, to other speakers who said they were unaware of the potential sale of the system until they received a township letter in the mail, a letter which arrived after the first two public informatio­n sessions had already occurred. “I am imploring you all to take an opportunit­y to table the vote until the May 20 meeting,” said Turnberry Farms resident Stephanie Rowe. “This is beneficial in several ways, the first being it allows all residents to be able to digest and question this decision that seems to be on a fast track for a reason that has not been satisfied by any of the presentati­ons that you allowed to happen with little or no response from the board — almost every question was deferred to either PFM or PA American Water,” Rowe said. Darryle Tillman, who appeared in scrubs while caring “for 104 patients, one third to one half of which have COVID-19,” also urged a delay. “This plan has its good points and its bad points, but it is ridiculous to do this in a Zoom meeting in the middle of a pandemic,” he said in reference to the on-line platform used for the meeting. Al Leach, who is also the vice president of the Pottsgrove School Board, also urged a pause. “I’m sure you’ve all done your due diligence, but a lot of residents are just finding out about this and would like to see if they can get more involved,” Leach said. “There are a lot of questions that need to get answered, like how the board intends to spend the proceeds, and the open space question,” he said. Although the presentati­on has identified the proceeds as paying down the sewer system debt; making the pension system whole and paying off general fund and road fund debt, two other proposed uses have raised questions. One is paying off debt undertaken by the open space fund, which is paid off with a voter-approved earned income tax; and infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts to the police station and township offices in the firehouse. No specific plan for those improvemen­ts has been presented as part of the sewer system sale proposal, said resident Doug Kern. “We have no access to the paperwork, no ability to examine this ourselves,” said Kern, who said he did not find out about the proposal until two of the public informatio­n sessions had already passed. “All I have is a bunch of slides, which changed after almost every meeting, and a lot of ‘take-my-word-forit-answers. It sounds like you have a 90-day window to make a decision,” said Kern, urging a delay or a no vote. Dustin Schreiber said his research indicates American Water, the parent company of the high bidder, “is owned by a German conglomera­te called RFWAG. I’d prefer we support an American company if we sell, and I’m not convinced we should sell.” Hanover Drive resident Keith Plumadore said he sees the sale as a shortterm fix for the township’s finances. “It’s a temporary reprieve from amateur fiscal management. The township did a good job with the (request for proposals) but I see no evidence the township will execute and bring better fiscal governance with the proceeds.” “When I moved here in 2000, the commission­ers and the people all worked together,” said Leach. “I implore you to at least consider the idea of tabling this motion, It would be so easy to delay this vote so we can get all our ducks in a row and demonstrat­e transparen­cy we always used to have in this community.” Slinkerd closed public comment and then called on Schreiber to outline the objections he has been posting on his Facebook page and the Turnberry Farms Facebook page. However, as Schreiber spoke, Slinkerd repeatedly interrupte­d him, talked over him and told him his points were not relevant to the subject at hand. “The sewer customers paid for the sewer, if they were stockholde­rs, they should be getting a bonus check, they’re getting the short end of the stick,” said Schreiber. “What about people who pay school taxes but don’t have any children in the system,” Slinkerd interjecte­d. “Should they not be taxed?” “Everyone has a chance to send to send students to school,” Schreiber replied. “What about open space, Martin?” Slinkerd interrupte­d again. “That’s paid with earned income tax, but seniors don’t pay that. Should we put signs up telling them they can’t use the open space?” Slinkerd asked. “We taxed ourselves for that,” Schreiber started to reply and Slinkerd pressed on. “We don’t separate our residents into septic or sewer residents. Are you saying that’s the way we should go?” As Schreiber tried to raise further points, Slinkerd continued to interrupt him. “That’s what you’ve been doing, going down this rabbit hole trying to dislodge what we’re talking about,” Slinkerd said. “You keep trying to throw things at the wall at the 11th hour to see what sticks to make it seem like you did research,” he continued. “You’ve had a year to think about this stuff.” “Are you going to let me finish?” Schreiber finally asked. “I never stopped you,” Slinkerd replied, finally allowing Schreiber to speak uninterrup­ted. The other commission­ers, Dave Waldt, Cathy Paretti and Renee Spaide all were permitted to speak uninterrup­ted, except when Schrieber spoke, thinking Paretti was finished with her point. He apologized for interrupti­ng her and urged her to go on. The other commission­ers joined in disputing Schreiber’s points. Spaide, who has served on the board for many years with Schreiber, read from a prepared statement that noted, in part, “all the commission­ers have been involved.” She said she agrees with Read that running the sewer system is a risk. “We have a road crew, not a sewer crew and Pennsylvan­ia American Water does this for a living,” said Spaide. Waldt said he and Paretti “ran on concern about the township’s finances. People were very unhappy.” He disputed Schreiber’s characteri­zation that he was left out of discussion­s. “We’ve spent hours on the budget and I never see you. You never participat­e,” said Waldt. “Dave and I started to get to get acquainted with this while we were running,” said Paretti. “We don’t have any business running a sewer business. If we keep it, our taxes would rise and the rates would be higher than if we didn’t own it.” She added, “I don’t wait to be invited into things, I ask for the informatio­n I need.” When Schreiber tried to point out he had asked Reddick for informatio­n and it took two days to get an answer, the other commission­ers leaped to her defense. “Michelle has a lot on her plate,” said Paretti. “Michelle has done an outstandin­g job,” said Slinkerd. Paretti pointed out that while people last night were complainin­g about having the meeting over Zoom, it had more participan­ts than most in-person township meetings. “It’s great to see so many people participat­e. This is not as many as we get at regular meetings. I’ve had people tell me they like this better,” said Paretti. “You’re never going to make everyone happy.” But even in a pandemic, “the one thing that can’t stop is your government,” Paretti said. After the vote, Slinkerd said the next steps would be discussed at a future meeting.

This article first appeared as a post in The Digital Notebook blog.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States