The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Lawmakers seek to curb price of virus drugs created by federal aid

- By Emilie Munson emilie.munson@hearstdc.com; Twitter: @emiliemuns­on

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of lawmakers want to use the billions of dollars the U.S. government is pouring into coronaviru­s treatment and vaccine developmen­t to negotiate down the price of those drugs when and if they reach the market.

Congress has appropriat­ed over $30 billion for pharmaceut­ical developmen­t in response to the coronaviru­s crisis, in three relief packages passed this spring and that money should come with some price accountabi­lity, said U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3. She leads the subcommitt­ee overseeing the National Institutes of Health and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Developmen­t Authority (BARDA), both of which have made grants to companies.

DeLauro and four other House members say that support should buy the taxpayers a say in the prices the companies charge for the vaccines and medical counter-measures financed by the public — and in informatio­n about the drugs.

“Today we are saying that a public health crisis should not be allowed to become a for-profit bonanza,” DeLauro said Monday. “Because taxpayers have contribute­d to this research and developmen­t, they should receive in return full transparen­cy into the investment­s and affordable access to their results.”

Congress has also required coronaviru­s testing and a future vaccine to be covered by public or private insurers without costsharin­g for the patient. The Trump administra­tion recently pledged that any vaccine for coronaviru­s will be free for “vulnerable” Americans who can’t afford it.

But even with these efforts to prevent vaccine costs from hitting the consumer, sky-high coronaviru­s drug prices paid by the U.S. government could ultimately mean a bill for taxpayers, while pharmaceut­ical companies see big payoffs.

The lack of a link between U.S. research support and final consumer prices has long been a source of friction in pharmaceut­icals as well as other technology developmen­t.

DeLauro and Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, Francis Rooney, R-Fl., and Peter DeFazio, D-Or., introduced legislatio­n Monday to leverage public payments in COVID-19 drugs to make them more affordable for consumers and win informatio­n from pharmaceut­ical companies on drug developmen­t costs.

A COVID-19 vaccine — the result of a worldwide race invlving numerous companies, including Paris-based Sanofi at its Protein Sciences unit in Meriden — could bring heated debates over pricing because it would instantly have near universal demand.

Called “Operation Warp Speed,” the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is rushing to help develop, manufactur­e and distribute 300 million doses of an effective COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021.

BARDA has distribute­d billions of dollars to companies such as AstraZenec­a, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Sanofi to spur clinical trials of coronaviru­s vaccines, while HHS has signed contracts worth hundreds of millions with companies that will produce the syringes and vials for vaccines.

NIH has also invested millions in potential treatments for COVID-19, like remdesivir, a drug made by Gilead Sciences that has been authorized by the Food and Drug Administra­tion for emergency use for hospitaliz­ed patients with severe disease.

DeLauro and Doggett pressed HHS in early May for a full accounting of government investment­s in remdesivir, government ownership of remdesivir patents and federal efforts to scale up production.

If passed, the legislatio­n introduced Monday would prohibit pharmaceut­ical monopolies on COVID-19 drugs and require the government to mandate reasonable, affordable pricing for any such drug. It would require companies receiving COVID-19 government research funds to publicly report the costs of developing their treatments and how much was paid for by federal dollars.

Another bill would create a database of all financial and non-financial support for pharmaceut­ical companies, and would require clinical trial data and agreements between the government and manufactur­ers to be published.

Illustrati­ng just how expensive coronaviru­s drugs could be, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, a nonprofit that analyzes drug pricing, reported if the price of remdesivir was set based on the cost of product, a 10-day course should be about $10. But if the drug were priced based on its effectiven­ess and demand, it could climb up to $4,500.

Gilead has announced it will donate an initial supply of 1.5 million doses of remdesivir, but after that it will have to put a price tag on the medication. Gilead said in May its investment in remdesivir in 2020 could be “up to $1 billion or more,” according to public filings made to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Before the coronaviru­s pandemic, lawmakers in both parties supported the idea of using Congress’s buying power through Medicare to try to lower prescripti­on drug prices but were unable to agree on specific legislatio­n to do it. That issue has been debated for more than 20 years.

 ?? Tasos Katopodis-Pool / Getty Images ?? Rosa DeLaur, D-Conn., of the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies subcomitte­e holds a photograph taken at the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri on Memorial Day weekend during a hearing on June 4 in Washington.
Tasos Katopodis-Pool / Getty Images Rosa DeLaur, D-Conn., of the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies subcomitte­e holds a photograph taken at the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri on Memorial Day weekend during a hearing on June 4 in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States