The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Kids would need parental consent for social media under proposal

- By Jessica Bravo CTMIRROR.ORG

Connecticu­t lawmakers are trying again this year to pass legislatio­n requiring social media companies to get parental consent before allowing anyone 16 or younger to use their platforms.

The bill, HB 5025, is an effort to support children’s mental health, sponsors said, and follows promises from lawmakers that they would focus on youth mental health this session.

The first version of this bill was introduced during the 2022 legislativ­e session by Christie Carpino, RCromwell. It died despite receiving unanimous support from the Children’s Committee.

Unlike last session, the bill will go now to the General Law Committee. Sen. James Maroney, D-Milford, the co-chair of the General Law Committee, said children’s issues should be a priority for everyone.

“I think it is a bipartisan issue in terms of everyone wants to protect our children and ensure that we are protecting their privacy,” he said.

Maroney said that while there are positives to social media, young people have also felt its negative effects.

“We also know we’ve seen the detrimenta­l effects on the mental health of our students,” Maroney said. “While we can’t necessaril­y say social media has caused [mental health issues], there is a strong correlatio­n between the rise of social media and the rise in anxiety among our students.”

Rep. Tami Zawistowsk­i, R-East Granby, is sponsoring the legislatio­n this session.

“People are trying to live up to unrealisti­c expectatio­ns that are set by social media,” Zawistowsk­i said, adding that she believes social media can have a negative impact on young people’s body image, which can lead to serious health issues such as eating disorders.

Zawistowsk­i said parents might support the legislatio­n because they witnessed firsthand during the pandemic lockdowns how social media negatively affects their children.

“I think there’s a lot more focus on mental health this session, and there has been for a while,” she said. “I think that this [bill] comes right into line with that.”

There has been an increase in both the numbers of young people having mental health problems and the severity of those problems over the last few years.

There is already opposition to the legislatio­n, however.

NetChoice, a coalition that represents numerous social media platforms and supports free, unrestrict­ed usage of the internet, intends to fight the proposal.

“Essentiall­y what this legislatio­n purports to do is to turn over parenting of teenagers to the tech industry, and plaintiffs’ attorneys, rather than letting parents decide what’s best for their own children,” said Carl Szabo, Vice President and General Counsel at NetChoice. “At the same time, it would actually require collection of the most sensitive and personal informatio­n about teenagers whenever they go around and access the internet.”

NetChoice sued California over legislatio­n regarding online child privacy protection that passed last year. The law puts more restrictio­ns on big tech companies to make sure they are appropriat­ely taking steps to ensure children are seeing ageappropr­iate ads and other online services.

Szabo said the California legislatio­n does not take into account that children mature at different ages. This can get complicate­d when big tech has to define what content is “age appropriat­e” for kids. He also said the legislatio­n is an infringeme­nt on the First Amendment.

He said Connecticu­t should first “empower students and parents” by teaching them how to safely use social media, protect their privacy online and be good digital citizens.

“Any parent, myself included, who thinks that their teenager is not more tech savvy than they are is deluding themselves,” Szabo said. “That’s essentiall­y what this legislatio­n is trying to do. It’s trying to ignore the reality that there are plenty of 12-yearolds on social media even though it’s against the Terms of Service and the contracts.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States