The Morning Call (Sunday)

Fewer children reading for fun; they are missing plenty

- By Karin Klein Karin Klein is an opinion writer for the Los Angeles Times.

It was Harry Potter — or, actually, his buddy Hermione Granger — who made my 6-year-old granddaugh­ter enthusiast­ic about learning to read.

She was reasonably interested in reading before that, though remote learning during most of her kindergart­en year means she and all the other first-graders at her small charter school along the central coast of California aren’t at the pre-pandemic levels of literacy for their age.

Then, as my daughter began reading the J.K. Rowling books to her, my granddaugh­ter discovered the girl witch and now is obsessed with books.

Hermione frequents the Hogwarts library and, just for the pleasure of it, absorbs the informatio­n within its books. More often than not, that informatio­n saves the day for her and her friends.

My granddaugh­ter wants to be a heroic brainiac just like Hermione. She knows that means unlocking the codes of reading.

Of course, she was probably destined to become a lover of reading. Her parents both have doctorates in English literature.

My daughter probably got much of her love of reading from me. I got it from my father, who dropped out of high school to support his parents and siblings during the Great Depression, but who nonetheles­s made weekly trips to the library throughout his life to borrow a stack of books that he would devour.

As a mother who had three kids in public schools, it always bugged me that the elementary school had a voluntary “reading club” in which students received prizes based on how much reading for pleasure they did each week. The message seems all wrong: We have to bribe you to read for fun.

All this comes to mind now that a survey by the National Assessment for Educationa­l Progress — the organizati­on that produces the periodic Nation’s Report Card based on student testing — found that the numbers of 9- and

13-year-olds who regularly read for pleasure had plummeted.

Elementary school children are more likely to read than their older counterpar­ts, according to the survey. But still, the number of 9-year-olds who say they read for enjoyment almost every day dropped from slightly more than half in 1984, to 42% during the 2019-20 school year.

The trend among middle schoolers is worse. The proportion who frequently read for fun dropped by more than half, to 17%, while the percentage who seldom or never do more than tripled.

This is worrisome for many reasons.

Kids who read for pleasure daily score the highest on reading assessment­s, according to the American Library Associatio­n; no surprise there. The link is especially strong when kids talk with others about the books they’re reading.

A British study found that reading for pleasure had much wider benefits, resulting in better vocabulary, spelling and mathematic­al abilities. And reading for pleasure was more important to those successes than were students’ socioecono­mic background­s. According to the nonprofit reading-advocacy group Kids Read Now, readers also learn better empathy, decision-making

and social skills.

One contributo­r to this dismaying trend seems obvious: Social media and other digital activities are heavy draws and can gobble up hours of time, according to the American Psychologi­cal Associatio­n.

But some librarians and students point to other reasons as well: As students advance in school, required reading of textbooks and classroom-assigned literature increases. They may be reading more, but often enjoying it less.

The world of the written word, whether it’s found in a leather-bound novel or the digital version of a newspaper, is a rich and wondrous place that makes almost all things possible. We expand our horizons every time we enter deeply personal or imagined worlds that may change our outlook on life, teach us how to grow our own vegetables, or, like Hermione, offer the secrets to save the world.

Learning how those mysterious black squiggles on the page translate to words and sentences is only the first part of reading. The second, more important part is learning to love what we find between the covers.

Reading for pleasure isn’t the same as assigned reading because kids need to be able to relax with the reading material of their choice, according to Kids Read Now. As a child, my son used to finish his reading for school and then sigh with pleasure, saying, “Now I can read.”

Parents play a key role in this, but many may not realize how important it is to expose their kids to books, magazines and the like. Robust funding of libraries, dedicated specifical­ly to public outreach, children’s book sections and fun, free activities for families would help. Instead of telling parents all about the grading rubrics in use, back-to-school nights should make reading for pleasure one of the major themes pushed home to parents, at all grade levels.

Giving older students more choices in what they read for class would help encourage pleasure reading too, while still requiring those books to have some rigor. The class could make group choices or students could pick from a menu of options instead of being assigned a single book.

This isn’t the dumbing down of school. It’s a realizatio­n that lifelong love of reading brings both soul-satisfying pleasure and extrinsic benefit. One of the greatest forms of learning that parents and teachers can impart to kids is the joy of diving into reading material, whether it’s a poem about nature, a murder mystery or an article about fast cars.

 ?? SANG TAN/AP ?? A first edition of “Harry Potter and the Philosophe­r’s Stone” by J.K.Rowling, top, a first edition of “Harry Porter and the Deathly Hallows,” middle, and a first edition of “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” are seen on display before the start of the Continenta­l & English Antiquaria­n Books, Modern First Editions auction in May 2010 in London.“Harry Potter and the Philosophe­r’s Stone”sold for $17,567,“Harry Porter and the Deathly Hallows”sold for $ 2,635 and the“Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”for $322.
SANG TAN/AP A first edition of “Harry Potter and the Philosophe­r’s Stone” by J.K.Rowling, top, a first edition of “Harry Porter and the Deathly Hallows,” middle, and a first edition of “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” are seen on display before the start of the Continenta­l & English Antiquaria­n Books, Modern First Editions auction in May 2010 in London.“Harry Potter and the Philosophe­r’s Stone”sold for $17,567,“Harry Porter and the Deathly Hallows”sold for $ 2,635 and the“Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban”for $322.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States