The Morning Call (Sunday)

Navy looks forward to new, higher-tech destroyer class

- By David Sharp

BATH, Maine — The Navy’s workhorse destroyer went into production more than 30 years ago, when Tom Stevens was a young welder.

Now the Navy is getting ready to turn the page as it looks to a future ship brimming with lasers that can shoot down missiles and attack enemies with hypersonic missiles topping 3,800 mph.

Stevens, 52, said the warship provides an opportunit­y to build something new after a historic production run of the Arleigh Burke class.

“It will be an impressive destroyer that will absolutely launch us into the next generation of ships,” said Stevens, director of ground assembly at Navy shipbuilde­r Bath Iron Works.

The stakes are high when it comes to a replacemen­t for the backbone of the fleet as the Navy faces a growing threat from China, whose numerical advantage becomes greater each year.

The first design contracts were awarded this summer to General Dynamics’ Bath Iron Works in Maine and Huntington Ingalls Industries in Mississipp­i for a large surface warship that would eventually follow production of the ubiquitous Burke destroyers.

All of that warfightin­g gear won’t come cheap.

The average cost of each new vessel, dubbed DDG(X), is projected to be a third more expensive than Burkes, the latest of which cost of about $2.2 billion apiece, according to the Congressio­nal Budget Office.

The Navy has vowed that it won’t repeat recent shipbuildi­ng debacles in which it rushed production and crammed too much new technology into ships, leading to delays and added expense with littoral combat ships, stealthy Zumwaltcla­ss destroyers, and the USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier.

“Rather than tying the success of DDG(X) to developmen­tal technology, we’re using known, mature technologi­es on a flexible platform that can be upgraded for decades to come, as the technology of tomorrow is matured and demonstrat­ed,” said Jamie Koehler, a Navy spokespers­on.

A shipyard in Marinette, Wisconsin, started constructi­on this month of the first in a new class of frigates, which are smaller than destroyers.

Those ships used an existing design, and there are no new weapon systems.

Still, there continues to be concern about the destroyer’s cost.

A high price tag would reduce the number of ships the Navy can afford to build, said Bryan Clark, defense analyst at the Hudson Institute.

“You’ll end up with the surface fleet that, instead of growing, it would be shrinking,” Clark said.

Production of the new ship is still years away.

For now, shipyards continue to produce Burkeclass destroyers, which earned a spot in the record book for a production run that has outlasted every other battleship, cruiser, destroyer and frigate in U.S. Navy history.

By the time the last Burke is built, it could surpass even the Nimitz aircraft carrier, which had a four-decade production run.

 ?? ROBERT F. BUKATY/AP 2009 ?? An Arleigh-Burke-class destroyer is christened at Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine. The Navy workhorse has served three decades but will soon be replaced.
ROBERT F. BUKATY/AP 2009 An Arleigh-Burke-class destroyer is christened at Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine. The Navy workhorse has served three decades but will soon be replaced.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States