The Morning Call (Sunday)

US: Many UFOs just foreign spies

Others are weather balloons or other airborne clutter

- By Julian E. Barnes

WASHINGTON — Government officials believe that surveillan­ce operations by foreign powers and weather balloons or other airborne clutter explain most recent incidents of unidentifi­ed aerial phenomenon — government-speak for UFOs — as well as many episodes in past years.

The sightings have puzzled the Pentagon and intelligen­ce agencies for years, fueling theories about visiting space aliens and spying by a hostile nation using advanced technology. But government officials say many of the incidents have far more ordinary explanatio­ns.

Intelligen­ce agencies are set to deliver a classified document to Congress by Monday updating a report made public last year that said nearly all of the incidents remain unexplaine­d. The original document looked at 144 incidents between 2004 and 2021 that were reported by U.S. government sources, mostly American military personnel.

This article is based on interviews with American officials familiar with the findings of the Pentagon and intelligen­ce agencies’ examinatio­n of the incidents. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the classified work.

Some of the incidents have been formally attributed to Chinese surveillan­ce — with relatively ordinary drone technology — and others are also thought to be connected to Beijing. China, which has stolen plans for advanced fighter planes, wants to learn more about how the United States trains its military pilots, according to American officials.

Much of the informatio­n

about the unidentifi­ed phenomena remains classified.

While Congress has been briefed on some of the conclusion­s about foreign surveillan­ce, Pentagon officials have kept most of the work secret — in large measure because they do not want China or other countries to know that their efforts to spy on the U.S. military were detected.

But such official secrecy comes at a cost, allowing conspiracy theories about government lies to thrive unchecked.

Sue Gough, a Defense Department spokespers­on, said the Pentagon remains committed to principles of openness but must balance that with “its obligation to protect sensitive informatio­n, sources and methods.”

While the Pentagon will not “rush to conclusion­s in our analysis,” Gough said, no single explanatio­n addresses the majority of unidentifi­ed

aerial phenomenon reports.

“We are collecting as much data as we can, following the data where it leads and will share our findings whenever possible,” she said.

It was not clear how much of the new intelligen­ce report would be made public. But of the cases that have been resolved, most have proved to be either errant junk in the sky, such as balloons, or surveillan­ce activity, officials said. Incidents recorded in the past year, for which more data has been collected, have turned out to have ordinary, earthbound explanatio­ns.

Officially, many of the older incidents are still unexplaine­d and there is too little data for Pentagon or intelligen­ce officials to make final conclusion­s.

“In many cases, observed phenomena are classified as ‘unidentifi­ed’ simply because sensors were not able to collect enough informatio­n

to make a positive attributio­n,” Gough said, referring to cameras, radar and other devices that collect informatio­n.

Other officials insist that even though the evidence is imperfect, the grainy videos do not show space aliens.

Optical illusions, along with the characteri­stics of classified sensors, have caused ordinary objects, like drones or balloons, to appear to be something unusual or frightenin­g.

In May, the Pentagon announced that previously released images of green triangles that looked like they could be alien ships were actually drones photograph­ed through nightvisio­n lenses.

Military officials declined to say precisely when or where the images were taken. But they believe the incidents are examples of attempts to conduct surveillan­ce on military maneuvers.

UFO skeptics and experts in optics have long said many of the videos and sightings by naval aviators represent optical illusions that have made ordinary objects — weather balloons, commercial drones — appear to move faster than possible.

Military officials have come to the same conclusion.

Besides the images of the green triangles, the other recordings released by the Pentagon have not been categorize­d as surveillan­ce incidents. But Pentagon officials do not believe that any of them represent aliens.

One of the videos, referred to as GoFast, appears to show an object moving at immense speed. But an analysis by the military says that is an illusion created by the angle of observatio­n against water. According to Pentagon calculatio­ns, the object is moving only about 30 mph.

Another video, known as Gimbal, shows an object that appears to be turning or spinning. Military officials now believe that the optics of the classified image sensor, designed to help target weapons, make the object appear like it is moving in a strange way.

Military analysts remain puzzled by the third video, known as Flir1. The object captured in the 2004 video appears to hover over the water, jump erraticall­y, then peel away. Military officials say that event is more difficult to explain, but officials who have studied it are convinced it is not a piece of alien technology.

Efforts by the Pentagon or intelligen­ce officials to stamp out theories about aliens have largely failed. The Pentagon has formed, and then reformed, groups inside the department to improve data collection around the incidents and provide better explanatio­ns.

Military officials have repeatedly said there is no evidence that any of the images show space alien visitors, comments often played down in the news media or ignored by lawmakers. In May, Pentagon officials testified under oath that the government had not collected materials from any alien landing on Earth. But the testimony did little to dampen enthusiasm for theories about extraterre­strial visitors.

There is a long history of the U.S. government using speculatio­n over conspiracy theories to prevent secrets from becoming widely known. During the developmen­t of American spy planes like the U-2 and SR-71 Blackbird, the government allowed rumors about UFO sightings to continue to help hide the developmen­t of those programs.

But intelligen­ce officials concluded long ago that using conspiracy theories as cover for classified programs sows distrust in the American government and paranoia.

 ?? MICHAEL A. MCCOY/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Scott Bray, the deputy director of Navy intelligen­ce, briefs the House Intelligen­ce Committee on May 22. Surveillan­ce operations by foreign powers explain many recent incidents, according to an upcoming report.
MICHAEL A. MCCOY/THE NEW YORK TIMES Scott Bray, the deputy director of Navy intelligen­ce, briefs the House Intelligen­ce Committee on May 22. Surveillan­ce operations by foreign powers explain many recent incidents, according to an upcoming report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States