The Morning Call (Sunday)

4-day work week makes sense since COVID-19

- Tina Hamilton

The average profession­al worker in the Lehigh Valley averages about 45-55 hours of work per week. Their days start early to keep up with the demands of life. Between work and home responsibi­lities, days can be long. Time to manage households and take care of families can often be limited.

Some of the tension was eased when organizati­ons moved to remote or hybrid work environmen­ts. Commute time was curtailed or eliminated. They could throw in some laundry and start dinner in between Zoom calls. It’s no surprise that today’s most highly requested benefit from employees looking for a job is remote or hybrid work.

During the pandemic, we learned to prize flexibilit­y, efficiency and accountabi­lity over showing your face at an office for a set number of hours.

Building on that revelation is a movement toward an even more progressiv­e model: a four-day work week — remote, hybrid or in-person. Sometimes it involves a reduction in hours as well, going from the traditiona­l 40 hours a week to 32 hours.

It is a concept backed by research. A six-month trial in the U.S. and Ireland in 2022 among 33 volunteer companies showed that a four-day, 32-hour work week had a positive impact on performanc­e, productivi­ty and employee well-being. Employees reported reduced stress and fatigue and improved work-life balance.

A separate 2022 trial of 70 firms in the United Kingdom saw 86% saying that a four-day week was so successful that they planned to keep it in place. They, too, experience­d an increase in productivi­ty and a financial benefit to employees on costs related to commuting and child care.

Similar trials in Belgium, Spain, Japan, Australia and New Zealand have been equally promising.

As the owner of a company who manages human resources for organizati­ons across the country, my first thought centered on how we respond to client needs when the team members who serve them are not available during normal business hours. Then it struck me: The change is in the idea of “normal business hours.” What is normal?

The idea of a 40-hour work week goes back a century to Henry Ford in the 1920s, and was eventually incorporat­ed into United States labor laws in the 1940s.

As an aside, renowned economist John Maynard Keynes predicted that technology and increased efficiency would give us a 15-hour workweek by 2030.

The pandemic disrupted many things, including how we view work. It upended the traditiona­l 9-to-5, Monday-throughFri­day schedule in an office. A portion of the entire world became remote workers. No one could have imagined it, yet here we are.

Many organizati­ons that tried the fourday work week staggered their workers’ days off to assure clients’ calls were still responded to and production lines kept running.

It’s the combinatio­n of employee satisfacti­on and the potential for more responsive customer service that has Allentown Mayor Matt Tuerk looking at a four-day, 40-hour week for employees in City Hall.

“Coming out of the pandemic, flexibilit­y was the name of the game. We want to offer an environmen­t that is respectful, caring and inclusive,” Tuerk said. “People might have home situations where four 10-hour days are better than five eight-hour days. It broadens the pool of potential employees.

“As we institutio­nalize the concept, we may be able to offer expanded hours with some people starting early or staying longer during their 10-hour days. It could improve the way we serve residents of Allentown.”

Despite the national news of layoffs, the job market is still competitiv­e in many regions and categories. Companies continue to seek unique perks and benefits to attract top talent without raising pay too

much. The shorter work week is an attractive selling point, especially if productivi­ty is not hurt. Workers who adapt to a 32-hour work week will find it hard to go back.

The migration to a fourday work week would likely impact organizati­ons significan­tly, even if they did not adopt it fully. Imagine how streamline­d processes would become. Think about how organizati­ons would be forced to collaborat­e more effectivel­y to compensate for fewer hours.

In that spirit, companies are now adopting ways to improve efficiency and offer flexibilit­y, such as meeting-free days, Friday half-days and other time-saving or time-shifting strategies.

There are many considerat­ions based on how each business operates. Workers who get paid hourly could see their compensati­on drop if their hours fell. Four 10-hour days or flexible scheduling could be an option. In addition, a business with both salaried and non-salaried workers might need to address dissent and allegation­s of favoritism if one segment of the workplace began working fewer hours for the same pay.

In addition, many jobs — manufactur­ing, logistics and service industries for example — already are highly efficient or staffed according to work volume, meaning a reduction in hours isn’t as feasible.

For those companies looking to evaluate if it’s a fit, I encourage them to check out the 4 Day Week pilot program at 4dayweek. com. The website dives deeper into the research and offers options for examining the possibilit­y at your workplace.

Tina Hamilton is president and CEO of myHR Partner Inc., a Lehigh Valley human resources outsourcin­g firm that manages HR for clients in 34 states. She can be reached at tina@ myhrpartne­rinc.com.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States