The Morning Call

Contaminat­ion dispute drags on

Neighborho­od has been using bottled water for 3 years with no end in sight

- By Justine McDaniel

It takes an entire gallon of bottled water for Elizabeth Smith to wash two heads of lettuce, using one hand to pour from the plastic jug and the other to rub the romaine clean. That’s one of the things she’s learned in the three years since she last risked drinking a drop of her home’s water.

She’s learned it takes another gallon, retrieved from the cabinet under the counter and emptied into a pot, to make spaghetti. She’s learned how to quickly tell which water bottle in a case is leaking. She’s learned that individual 16-ounce bottles are easiest for brushing teeth, each family member’s initials written on the cap in green marker.

Smith, a 44-year-old Bucks County mother, has learned other things, too: That the government officials who she thought would help her won’t answer her emails. That the guidelines her family was given by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency don’t always make sense: Don’t wash produce with tap, but you can wash dishes, for instance. And that no one, not the Navy, the EPA, or anyone else, seems able to tell her when her family will have clean water again.

“This is three years with absolutely no movement, nothing,” Smith said Monday, standing in the kitchen of the threebedro­om house she and her husband once hoped to sell. “They’re still playing the blame game, and we’re the ones with our lives still on hold.”

Smith’s home, where even the fish tank bubbles with bottled water and the recycling bin is constantly filling with plastic jugs, is among tens of thousands in Bucks and Montgomery counties with drinking water contaminat­ed by harmful chemicals that, in most cases, flowed off two former military bases. Since the high chemical levels were discovered between 2014 and 2016, public drinking water has been cleaned and most houses with contaminat­ed wells have been connected by the military to drinkable water.

The local water authority told

the Navy in 2017 that it would cost $1.8 million to build a water main connecting the Smiths’ Warwick Township neighborho­od to the township water or $883,000 to contract with the North Wales Water Authority to run pipes to one of its mains, Warwick water authority Executive Director Mike Sullivan said.

But the Navy says it isn’t responsibl­e for the contaminat­ion affecting those homes, although it is supplying affected homes with bottled water. The EPA is finishing tests to identify the source. So Smith, her husband and their children, along with a half-dozen neighbors, are still waiting, still using bottled water for everything except showers and laundry. And the homeowners say the contaminat­ion has affected their daily lives, their home values and their plans.

“We’re the forgotten stepchildr­en,” said Heather McMullen, 58, who moved into the house next door to Smith’s 32 years ago. “’You’ll get hooked up to public water.’ When they told us that in 2016, I didn’t think it would be 2019 and we’re still not hooked up.”

Travel two miles along Bristol Road from the now-closed Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster and you’ll come to the village of Hartsville in Warwick Township. Two centuries before either PFAS chemicals or plastic water bottles were invented, George Washington marched his army down the path that is now Old York Road.

The houses that now line it and adjacent Hart Lane were built in the 1950s, with more green space between them than is found in most of today’s developmen­ts.

It was 2016 when Smith and McMullen heard from neighbors that they should test their wells, the same time as scores of residents in Horsham, Warrington and Warminster townships were notified that their drinking water had been contaminat­ed by per- and poly-fluoro-alkyl substances. The chemicals, known as PFAS, were present in firefighti­ng foams used at the Warminster and Willow Grove air bases and have leached into groundwate­r and soil.

Public water systems had never tested for PFAS before, and the chemicals were discovered nationwide, setting off a crisis for many communitie­s. PFAS, which were also used by manufactur­ing companies and in products like Teflon and Scotchgard, have been linked to cancers, thyroid disease and other serious health problems.

So every two weeks, the Smiths receive three 5-gallon jugs, four cases of 24 drinking-size bottles, and four boxes each containing six 1-gallon jugs. The Navy-approved water cooler that dispenses from the 5-gallon containers doesn’t have a hot water spigot, so the family has to heat water on the stove.

“If you’re ever wondering how inconvenie­nt it really is, turn off your water for a week,” said Smith. Her children were 8 and 10 when they found out about the water; now, they’re 12 and 14. “Don’t use your faucet. Try it. See what it’s like. It’s not fun.”

A few scattered houses in the Willow Grove-Warminster region are still being hooked up to public water with military funding; in Horsham, for example, 90 well owners have been connected, four have declined or not responded to the offer, and four are in progress, the water authority said. Another group of houses in East and West Rockhill townships remains on bottled water because of nonmilitar­y PFAS contaminat­ion.

State lawmakers and members of Congress are working on bills to force officials to regulate the chemicals. Homeowners in similarly affected communitie­s nationwide, some of whom also have had to use bottled water, have lobbied officials for immediate cleanup and safety standards. Some have sued the chemical manufactur­ers or alleged polluters.

But in Hartsville, all of that seems to have occurred on a different planet. The lobbying, the politics, the meetings, none of it matters to people without tap water.

“It’s a real injustice when I read the newspaper and officials say ‘Oh, we took care of it.’ No, we took care of it for the people with the public water,” McMullen said. “Did you forget about the people that can’t get their water the way you get it?”

Warwick Township is ready to connect the homes to public water as soon as funding is in place, township Manager Kyle Seckinger said.

“We have constructi­on cost estimates, we have constructi­on plans. We were ahead of this three years ago so that once the funding was made available we could immediatel­y go to bid and get the water installed as quickly as humanly possible,” he said.

Denying that the chemicals could have flowed from its base to these houses, the Navy has pointed to the Hartsville Fire Company, according to township officials and the fire company. Surface testing did not confirm that the fire company caused the contaminat­ion; the EPA did groundwate­r testing in April and said Thursday the results were expected within two weeks.

“We’re all holding our breath waiting for this to come out,” fire company President Ed Pfeiffer said. “The chances are about, I don’t know, one in a million that we’re the contaminat­ors. That’s my bet; we’re coming up clean and the burden’s back on them.”

Hartsville firefighte­rs never dispensed the chemical-laced foam at their station, said Pfeiffer, who has been with the fire company for 51 years. In fact, the only times they trained with it were at the naval air base, he said.

Pfeiffer said he had not considered what the volunteer company would do if it were deemed responsibl­e; it does not have scads of money. “That would be probably somewhat catastroph­ic for us,” he said.

“As we evaluate the results of the groundwate­r sampling, EPA will determine if additional sampling is appropriat­e and if additional potential sources of PFAS need to be evaluated,” the EPA said in a statement.

Citing its media policy, the Navy declined a request for a phone interview. A spokespers­on said an emailed response to questions submitted by The Inquirer would require about two weeks.

“We’ve been struggling to get the Navy to provide the funding,” said Seckinger, the township manager, “and we feel like we may be on the verge of something here when we get this test back.”

The debate over who pays is a source of frustratio­n for residents. Smith and McMullen both speculated that the money the Navy has spent on bottled water could have paid for a good portion of the public water hookup.

The military did not respond to questions about how much money it has spent.

“I just wish the Navy would have said, ‘You know what, yeah, we’ll step up and take care of it,’ and then figure out who pays for it later — not make us suffer and us deal with it for three years,” said Smith.

McMullen and her husband both grew up on farms and loved the Hartsville home’s spacious yard, where they gardened extensivel­y until the contaminat­ion was discovered. Like the Smiths, they considered moving but concluded they couldn’t. Both families ended up paying for renovation­s instead.

“If I wanted to sell it, I couldn’t sell it for what it’s worth,” McMullen said. “Because who wants to buy a home that has a contaminat­ed well?”

Leonard Sgrillo, another Old York Road resident, recalled seeing his affected neighbor get water deliveries until she sold her house and left. The 1,400square-foot, three-bedroom house went for $259,000 in January, according to county property records. Adjusted for inflation, that’s less than what it sold for in 1989.

“We’re tired of this,” McMullen said. “To me, somebody has a responsibi­lity to go, ‘We’re going to make you whole, and then we’re going to fight it out and somebody will pay somebody else.’”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States