Phillie Pha­natic cre­ators ask for full own­er­ship of mas­cot

The Morning Call - - SPORTS - By Oona Goodin-Smith

PHILADELPH­IA — When it comes to their rights to the Phillie Pha­natic, the iconic, fuzzy, green-beaked mas­cot’s de­sign­ers aren’t afraid to play a lit­tle hard­ball.

Af­ter be­ing ac­cused by the Phillies in a fed­eral law­suit of try­ing to make the Pha­natic a “free agent,” New York­based pup­pet mak­ers Bon­nie Erick­son and Wayde Har­ri­son filed a coun­ter­claim this week that as­serts the base­ball team had no part in cre­at­ing the beloved gy­rat­ing, flight­less Gala­pa­gan bird mas­cot, claim­ing “the Phillies are al­ler­gic to the real facts.”

The pair asked a judge to award them full copy­right rights to the Pha­natic as of June 15, 2020 — when a 1984 agree­ment made be­tween the cre­ators and the Phillies ex­pires.

Fur­ther­more, the fil­ing claims, the Phillies’ Au­gust law­suit against Har­ri­son and Erick­son is an at­tempt to “bully” the pup­pet mak­ers and is be­ing used as a “weapon” to pres­sure them into ac­cept­ing less money from the Phillies for the re­newal of the Pha­natic’s copy­right.

“De­spite the twisted al­le­ga­tions of the Com­plaint, it is un­de­ni­able that for four decades The Phillies ab­so­lutely knew and re­peat­edly ac­knowl­edged that [Har­ri­son and Erick­son] were the sole au­thors of Pha­natic copy­right,” the coun­ter­claim reads.

In Au­gust, the Phillies sued Har­ri­son and Erick­son, ac­cus­ing them of threat­en­ing to with­draw from a 1984 agree­ment to let the Phillies use the mas­cot “for­ever,” and forc­ing them to ei­ther rene­go­ti­ate the rights to the hot dog-launch­ing men­ace for “mil­lions of dol­lars” or “make the Pha­natic a free agent.”

The Phillies bought the copy­right rights to the Pha­natic in 1984 for $250,000. Ac­cord­ing to fed­eral copy­right law, af­ter 35 years, artists can rene­go­ti­ate the rights to their cre­ation.

But, the Phillies claim, the base­ball fran­chise is just as re­spon­si­ble for the suc­cess of the Pha­natic as Har­ri­son and Erick­son, giv­ing them the right to use a mas­cot the team says it co-au­thored.

Mean­while, Har­ri­son and Erick­son — who also cre­ated the famed Mup­pet Miss Piggy — say they solely cre­ated the Pha­natic’s char­ac­ter and back­story, from his mega­phone-shaped snout (“be­cause the name Pha­natic im­plied a loud and bois­ter­ous char­ac­ter”) to his ver­dant fur (“a green mas­cot would stand out among the mul­ti­col­ored seats”).

The Phillies, who have pre­vi­ously de­clined to com­ment on the lit­i­ga­tion, didn’t im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment. 2019 The Philadelph­ia In­quirer Visit The Philadelph­ia In­quirer at www.in­quirer.com Distribute­d by Tri­bune Con­tent Agency, LLC.

MATT ROURKE/AP

The cre­ators of the Phillie Pha­natic mas­cot want a judge to award them full copy­right rights when their deal with the Phillies ex­pires in 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.