Constitutionalist conservatives uphold letter of the law All counties should pass leash laws

Much ado has been made about the personal beliefs of some of the Supreme Court nominees. Ruth Bader Ginsburg had personal beliefs. The guarantee, however, that a judge’s personal beliefs won’ t infringe on their decisions seems to only go one way, and it is not a constitutionalist conservative that is a danger to impartiality.

Liberal justices have redefined, rewritten and expanded the meaning and applications of law to bend them to their whims under the flag of a living, breathing Constitution for decades.

Constitutionalists are committed to an interpretation of law as written, with the original intent paramount. If a strict interpretation of existing law is not sufficient, liberals are admitting that their legislators are incompetent or unwilling to propose changes needed or that the public would reject those ideas if presented to them. George Roxandich

Bethlehem

Its amazing that in Pennsylvania, few cities have a leash law. Most other areas only require dogs be under immediate control of their owners. But if the dog runs off, how is it in immediate control of the owner if it didn’t have a leash for the owner to keep it under control?

All counties in the state of Pennsylvania should require that dogs be on leashes in any public setting, unless it’s a fenced-off dog walk. It only takes the most well-behaved dog a second to get excited and bite someone.

I tell everyone, please, not to walk their dogs on myproperty. I don’t pay a mortgage to have myproperty used as a toilet for other people’s pets. It’s only commonsense that a dog cannot be under immediate control in any public setting unless it’s on a leash. Cesar Lopez

Palmer Township