The Morning Call

Senate OKs landmark marriage bill

61-36 vote advances protection­s for gay, interracia­l nuptials

- By Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON — The Senate passed bipartisan legislatio­n Tuesday to protect same-sex marriages, an extraordin­ary sign of shifting national politics on the issue and a measure of relief for the hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples who have married since the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision that legalized gay marriage nationwide.

The bill, which would ensure that same-sex and interracia­l marriages are enshrined in federal law, was approved 61-36 Tuesday. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the legislatio­n was “a long time coming” and part of America’s “difficult but inexorable march towards greater equality.”

Democrats are moving quickly, while the party still holds the majority in both chambers of Congress, to send the bill to the House and then — they hope — to President Joe Biden’s desk. The bill has gained steady momentum since the Supreme Court’s June decision that overturned the federal right to an abortion, a ruling that included a concurring opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas that suggested same-sex marriage could also come under threat. Bipartisan Senate negotiatio­ns got a kick-start this summer when 47 Republican­s unexpected­ly voted for a House bill and gave supporters new optimism.

The legislatio­n would not force any state to allow same-sex couples to marry. But it would require states to recognize all marriages that were legal where they were performed, and protect current same-sex unions, if the court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision were to be overturned.

That’s a stunning bipar

tisan endorsemen­t, and evidence of societal change, after years of bitter divisivene­ss on the issue.

The bill would also protect interracia­l marriages by requiring states to recognize legal marriages regardless of “sex, race, ethnicity or national origin.”

A new law protecting samesex marriages would be a major victory for Democrats as they relinquish their two years of consolidat­ed power in Washington, and a massive win for advocates who have been pushing for decades for federal legislatio­n. It comes as the LGBTQ community has faced violent attacks, such as the shooting Nov. 19 at a gay nightclub in Colorado that killed five people and injured at least 17.

The vote was personal for many senators too.

Schumer said Tuesday that he was wearing the tie he wore at his daughter’s wedding, “one of the happiest moments of my life.” He also recalled the “harrowing conversati­on” he had with his daughter and her wife in September 2020 when they heard that liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had passed away. “Could our right to marry be undone?” they asked at the time.

With conservati­ve Justice Amy Coney Barrett replacing Ginsburg, the court has now overturned Roe v. Wade and the federal right to an abortion, stoking fears about Obergefell and other rights protected by the court. But sentiment has shifted on same-sex marriage, with more than two-thirds of the public now in support.

Still, Schumer said it was notable that the Senate was even having the debate after years of Republican opposition. “A decade ago, it would have strained all of our imaginatio­ns to envision both sides talking about protecting the rights of same-sex married couples,” he said.

Passage came after the Senate rejected three Republican amendments to protect the rights of religious institutio­ns and others to still oppose such marriages. Supporters of the legislatio­n argued those amendments were unnecessar­y because the bill had already been amended to clarify that it does not affect rights of private individual­s or businesses that are currently enshrined in law. The bill would also make clear that a marriage is between two people, an effort to ward off some far-right criticism that the legislatio­n could endorse polygamy.

Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who has been lobbying his fellow GOP senators to support the legislatio­n for months, pointed to the number of religious groups supporting the bill, including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Some of those groups were part of negotiatio­ns on the bipartisan amendment.

“They see this as a step forward for religious freedom,” Tillis says.

The nearly 17-million member, Utah-based faith said in a statement this month that church doctrine would continue to consider samesex relationsh­ips to be against God’s commandmen­ts. Yet it said it would support rights for same-sex couples as long as they didn’t infringe upon religious groups’ right to believe as they choose.

Along with Tillis, Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, who had supported the bill early on and lobbied their GOP colleagues to support it, the other Republican­s who voted for the legislatio­n in two earlier test votes, and again on Tuesday were: Republican Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina, Todd Young of Indiana, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Mitt Romney of Utah, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, and Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan of Alaska.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer talks to reporters ahead of the marriage bill vote Tuesday.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer talks to reporters ahead of the marriage bill vote Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States