The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Contractor wins lawsuit against city

Black River restoratio­n work awarded to Mark Schaffer Excavating & Trucking

- By Richard Payerchin rpayerchin@morningjou­rnal.com @MJ_JournalRic­k on Twitter

The city of Lorain must award the contract for a Black River ecological restoratio­n project to the low bidder who sued to get the job, according to a Lorain County Common Pleas Court ruling June 14.

Mark Schaffer Excavating & Trucking fought City Hall and won.

Common Pleas Judge Christophe­r Rothgery ruled the company had the low bid and must get the contract for a multi-million-dollar earth-moving project that will change the landscape behind the steel mills along the Black River.

Rothgery said the city staff were “arbitrary and unreasonab­le” managing the bidding process.

He issued his decision speaking from the bench in a hearing

lasting less than 10 minutes.

Afterward, Jason Schaffer, vice president of Mark Schaffer Excavating, declined to comment.

Schaffer left the hearing with attorneys Rob Remington, Christina Hassel, Jeff Brauer and their colleagues.

Lorain Assistant Law Director Don Zaleski and Storm Water Manager Kate Golden were present, along with an attorney for Mark Haynes Constructi­on, of Collins, and others.

Golden deferred comment to Lorain Safety-Service Director Dan Given, who was not immediatel­y available.

At trial

The judge’s ruling came after a daylong bench trial June 13.

Those involved recounted the process, with Rothgery noting there was no dispute to the operative facts of the case.

On Jan. 24, the city advertised for bids for the job, which originally was estimated to cost more than $6.72 million.

Mark Schaffer Excavating’s bid of about $4.2 million was the lowest by $180,000.

The city, working with Coldwater Consulting LLC, advised Mark Schaffer Excavating that the bid package was incomplete because it lacked proof of pollution liability insurance and audited financial documents.

The city staff awarded the job to Mark Haynes Constructi­on, then later decided to throw out all the proposals and rebid the project.

The second time around, another company had the lowest price, Mark Haynes Constructi­on was secondlowe­st and Mark Schaffer Excavating was the thirdlowes­t.

When the city awarded the project to Mark Haynes Constructi­on, Mark Schaffer Excavating filed the lawsuit seeking a court order to win the job.

In the bench trial, Remington argued the city bid informatio­n never stated contractor­s needed to supply proof of pollution liability insurance and audited financial documents.

He argued city staff and the consultant­s treated Mark Schaffer Excavating disparatel­y and disclosed confidenti­al informatio­n by releasing the first round of bids.

Lorain Law Director Pat Riley argued the city was trying to maintain the integrity of the bidding process when staff threw out the first round of bids.

Arbitrary and unreasonab­le

But Lorain officials were “arbitrary and unreasonab­le” in doing so, Rothgery said, and the city “undermined the integrity of the bidding process.”

“Lorain acted unreasonab­ly in issuing the letter to MSE (Mark Schaffer Excavating) rejecting their bid as incomplete, when the criteria for which they found the bid to be incomplete was not called for in the bidding applicatio­n process,” Rothgery’s ruling said.

Further, Haynes did not provide proof of current pollution liability insurance for Lorain to even argue that it was this missing documentat­ion that they relied upon in determinin­g whether the Haynes was the “best” bidder, the ruling said.

“It was further unreasonab­le for Lorain to not attempt to cure the bidding process by simply requesting that MSE supplement their bid with the additional documents so that MSE’s bid was not deficient,” the ruling said. “Rather, Lorain chose to reject all bids, reopen the bidding process and disclose the bidding numbers before a second round of bids was received and the contract ultimately awarded.

“The court finds MSE has establishe­d Lorain’s abuse of discretion by clear and convincing evidence.”

Scope of work

As for the project, the work involves removing or burying more than 100,000 cubic yards of material and bringing in new topsoil that will allow growth of plants.

The city will pay for the work with money from the Great Lakes Restoratio­n Initiative, coming from the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s Great Lakes National Program Office.

Golden has said it will be the capstone of restoratio­n work paid for with a grant of about $15 million for Lorain, first announced in 2015.

The work is expected to take several months and was to be completed by Sept. 30.

Because of the delay due to the legal actions, Golden has said the federal regulators could work with the city to determine an appropriat­e later completion date.

 ?? RICHARD PAYERCHIN — THE MORNING JOURNAL ?? This shows the green flood plain and gray hills of slag that sit between the steel mills and the Black River in Lorain.
RICHARD PAYERCHIN — THE MORNING JOURNAL This shows the green flood plain and gray hills of slag that sit between the steel mills and the Black River in Lorain.
 ?? RICHARD PAYERCHIN — THE MORNING JOURNAL ?? A number of representa­tives of contractor­s walk up a path carved into the mounds of slag stockpiled for decades between the steel mills and Black River in Lorain. They were there as part of a pre-bid meeting and site visit hosted by Coldwater Consulting LLC, which is working with the city of Lorain. Contractor Mark Schaffer Excavating bid on the project and sued the city of Lorain and won the job, according to a judge’s ruling on June 14.
RICHARD PAYERCHIN — THE MORNING JOURNAL A number of representa­tives of contractor­s walk up a path carved into the mounds of slag stockpiled for decades between the steel mills and Black River in Lorain. They were there as part of a pre-bid meeting and site visit hosted by Coldwater Consulting LLC, which is working with the city of Lorain. Contractor Mark Schaffer Excavating bid on the project and sued the city of Lorain and won the job, according to a judge’s ruling on June 14.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States