The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Women facing restrictio­ns seek abortions out of state

- By ChristinaA. Cassidy

ATLANTA >> At a routine ultrasound when she was five months pregnant, Hevan Lunsford began to panicwhen the technician took longer than normal, then told her she would need to see a specialist.

Lunsford, a nurse in Alabama, knew it was serious and begged for an appointmen­t the next day.

That’s when the doctor gave her and her husband the heartwrenc­hing news: The baby boy they decided to name Sebastian was severely underdevel­oped and had only half a heart. If he survived, he would need care to ease his pain and several surgeries. He may not live long.

Lunsford, devastated, asked the doctor about ending the pregnancy.

“I felt the only way to guarantee that he would not have any suffering was to go through with the abortion,” she said of that painful decision nearly three years ago.

But the doctor said Alabama law prohibits abortions after five months. He handed Lunsford a piece of paper with informatio­n for a clinic in Atlanta, a roughly 180-mile drive east.

Lunsford is one of thousands of women in the U.S. who have crossed state lines for an abortion in recent years as states have passed ever stricter laws and as the number of clinics has declined.

Although abortion opponents say the laws are intended to reduce abortions and not send people to other states, at least 276,000 women terminated their pregnancie­s outside their home state between 2012 and 2017, according to an Associated Press analysis of data collected from state reports and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In New Mexico, the number of women from out of state who had abortions more than doubled in that period, while Missouri women represente­d nearly half the abortions performed in neighborin­g Kansas.

“The procedure itself was probably the least traumatic part of it,” Lunsford said. “If it would have been at my hospital, there would have been a feeling like what I was doing was OK and a reasonable choice.”

While abortions across theU.S. are down, the share of women who had abortions out of state rose slightly, by half a percentage point, and certain states had notable increases over the six-year period, according to AP’s analysis.

In pockets of the Midwest, South and Mountain West, the number of women terminatin­g a pregnancy in another state rose considerab­ly, particular­ly where a lack of clinics means the closest provider is in another state or where less restrictiv­e policies in a neighborin­g state make it easier and quicker to terminate a pregnancy there.

“In many places, the right to abortion exists on paper, but the ability to access it is almost impossible,” said Amy Hagstrom Miller, CEO of Whole Women’s Health, which operates seven abortion clinics in Maryland, Indiana, Texas, Virginia and Minnesota. “We see people’s access to

care depend on their ZIP code.”

Nationwide, women who traveled from another state received at least 44,860 abortions in 2017, themost recent year available, according to the AP analysis of data from 41 states.

That’s about 10% of all reported procedures that year, but counts from nine states, including highly populated California and Florida, and the District Columbia were not included either because they were not collected or reported across the full six years.

Thirteen states saw a rise in the number of out-of-state women having abortions between 2012 and 2017.

New Mexico’s share of abortions performed on women from out of state more than doubled from 11% to roughly 25%. One likely reason is that a clinic in Albuquerqu­e is one of only a few independen­t facilities in the country that perform abortions close to the third trimester without conditions.

Georgia’s share of abortions involving out-of-state women rose from 11.5% to 15%, while North Carolina saw its share increase from 16.6% to 18.5%.

North Carolina had one of the highest shares of out-of-state abortions in 2017. While both states have passed restrictiv­e laws, experts and advocates say they are slightly more accessible than some of their surroundin­g states. In Illinois, the percentage of abortions performed on nonresiden­ts more than doubled to 16.5% of all reported state abortions in 2017. That is being driven in large part by women fromMissou­ri, one of six states with only a single abortion provider.

Even that provider, in St. Louis, has been under threat of closing after the state health department refused to renew its license.

Missouri lawmakers also passed a law this year that would ban almost all abortions past eight weeks of a pregnancy, but it faces a legal challenge.

About 10 miles from St. Louis, across the Mississipp­i River, is the Hope Clinic in Granite City, Illinois, which has seen a 30% increase in patients this year and has added two doctors, deputy director Alison Dreith said.

About 55 percent of its patients come from Missouri, and it also sees women from Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. All those states have mandatory waiting periods to receive an abortion, a requiremen­t Illinois does not have.

Dreith called it a scary time for women in states with highly restrictiv­e laws and few clinics.

 ?? VASHA HUNT — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Hevan Lunsford poses for a photo with her son’s ultrasound­s and footprints and handprints of her son, in Prattville, Ala.
VASHA HUNT — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Hevan Lunsford poses for a photo with her son’s ultrasound­s and footprints and handprints of her son, in Prattville, Ala.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States