The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

The new secondhand smoking?

- Joelle Renstrom The Conversati­on is an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency first warned of secondhand smoke in 1991, some 30 years after scientists determined that smoking cigarettes causes cancer. Today, a growing body of research points toward a new indirect health hazard.

Just as frequently being around other people while they smoke can cause cancer, heart disease, lung disease and other ailments, what I call “secondhand screen time” could be endangerin­g children.

By not limiting their own phone use, parents and other caregivers may be unwittingl­y setting kids up to be addicted to screens.

Checking Twitter in front of kids is not the same as blowing smoke in their faces. Smartphone­s and cigarettes do, however, have some things in common. Both are addictive and both became wildly popular before researcher­s learned about their addictive properties and health dangers.

On average, American adults touch their phones over 2,500 times a day. According to the American Psychiatri­c Associatio­n, that fits the definition of addiction: “a condition in which a person engages in the use of a substance or in a behavior for which the rewarding effects provide a compelling incentive to repeatedly pursue the behavior despite detrimenta­l consequenc­es.” While researcher­s continue to study the effects and extent of phone use, the scientific consensus is that phone addiction is real.

What’s a parent to do while nursing or when an infant falls asleep on one’s chest?

Perhaps they’ll read the news, check email, text friends or scan social media parenting groups. A phone or tablet can be a portal to the rest of the world – after all, caring for small children can be isolating.

But kids, even babies, notice these habits. They see parents reach again and again for a seemingly magical object that glints and flashes, makes sounds and shows moving images.

Some researcher­s have already found links between excessive screen time, particular­ly phone use, and attention deficits, behavioral issues, sleep problems, impaired social skills, loneliness, anxiety and depression.

Researcher­s from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and Israel’s Educationa­l Neuroimagi­ng Center recently published a study in JAMA Pediatrics that focused on cognitive-behavioral risks of exposing preschool-aged kids to screen-based media. That includes video games, TV, websites and apps. Phones are particular­ly problemati­c, the study found, because they provide mobile access to all of this media. They found that screen exposure impedes the formation of nerve systems involved in language developmen­t, expression and reading skills.

These findings point to yet another consequenc­e of excessive screen time, especially for younger kids. Since 96% of Americans have phones, many babies are exposed to screens soon after they’re born and the stakes of such exposure are becoming better understood.

To be sure, it’s hard if not impossible to assess how much time Americans are spending looking at screens given the countless different ways that people use their devices.

And because not all screen time is equally good or bad for you, some experts are calling for a “Human Screenome Project” to assess what we’re doing on our screens and to figure out what the consequenc­es might be.

When younger kids are exposed to harmful, habit-forming behaviors, such as smoking cigarettes or gambling, they’re more likely to become addicted to those same substances or behaviors. Exposure to secondhand smoke itself also can make kids prone to cigarette addiction.

While scientists don’t yet know for sure if that happens to kids who observe their parents’ phone use, there’s ample evidence that kids learn from and mimic their parents’ behaviors. If children see their parents do something they’re not allowed to do, that behavior doesn’t seem bad or wrong, and they may desire the “forbidden fruit” all the more.

I’ve seen parents hand over iPhones to 2-year-olds to placate them in restaurant­s, just as mine sometimes plopped me down in front of the TV to keep me occupied. The difference is that I couldn’t bring the TV to the dinner table, or anywhere else.

The human brain continues developing until we’re roughly 25 years old, so teenage behavior can have a significan­t and lasting impact. Research indicates that the adolescent brain is particular­ly prone to risk-taking, peer-seeking and lack of impulse control.

Between that and a lifetime of fetishizin­g screens, is it any wonder that so many teenagers won’t put their phones down?

My college students describe the disconcert­ing and disappoint­ing quiet that sets in when they’re at a table in the dining hall or in someone’s dorm room and everyone’s deep into a phone. Phones facilitate an incalculab­le amount of important interactio­ns for them, especially with friends and family back home.

But by the time they’re in college, they can recognize and articulate at least some of what they’re missing when they spend so much time staring at screens. They can assess their own habits and implement some changes if they so choose, but it makes sense that they, having been raised with this techno-magic, would never think of giving it up.

A 2-month-old or a 2-yearold, however, can’t do that. Since the frontal cortex of an adolescent brain is still developing, teenagers aren’t fully able to reason or control impulses.

Perhaps, most adults can’t either. But since it’s up to today’s adults to shape younger generation­s, we should be aware of the secondhand effects of our own behavior.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States