The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

No need for human forays into space

- By Ross Marchand Ross Marchand is a senior fellow at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

It looks like mankind won’t be going back to the moon … on schedule, at least. According to a recent report by the National Aeronautic­s and Space Administra­tion’s inspector general, astronaut suits have been delayed by two years due to an array of technical, funding, and COVIDrelat­ed challenges.

The American people might have reasonably assumed that developing spacesuits is not a problem for NASA. After all, the water cooled, nonflammab­le Apollo-era suits seemed to pose little problem for pioneers such as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. But recent problems with current spacesuit design first started to surface in 2017 when the IG reported, “despite spending nearly $200 million on extravehic­ular spacesuit developmen­t over the previous 9-year period, the Agency remained years away from having a flightread­y spacesuit to use on exploratio­n missions.”

Since that report, NASA spent an additional $220 million on developing a new spacesuit. And total spending will wind up costing the agency more than $1 billion.

According to the IG, the nextgenera­tion suits will, “feature a new design to accommodat­e a broader range of sizes and improve fit, comfort and mobility,” a response to complaints that existing spacesuits don’t fit all body types. It’s frankly unclear why NASA cares so much about increasing the fit and flexibilit­y of their suits.

Even if NASA has better reasons for designing a new suit, the process would be less expensive if they relied on outside contractin­g. SpaceX has offered its services, and chances are a privately-designed spacesuit wouldn’t cost $1 billion.

Cost considerat­ions aside, the focus on spacesuit design neglects the bigger picture. Perhaps

it’s time for policymake­rs to question the wisdom of human exploratio­n missions. Despite bipartisan hype, manned missions to outer space are notoriousl­y overrated. Robotic missions are a far more cost-effective way of discoverin­g the skies above. Cambridge Cosmology and astrophysi­cs professor and astronomer royal Martin Rees rightly points out that, “the practical case (for human spacefligh­t) gets weaker and weaker with every advance in robotics and miniaturiz­ation.”

Regardless of which spacesuits astronauts don in the future, it is time to rethink the Earthly obsession with sending humans to explore other worlds. Naked robots are far better at extraterre­strial endeavors than bundled-up astronauts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States