The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

The best reason to take vitamin D is low level

- Keith Roach Contact Dr. Roach at ToYourGood­Health@med. cornell.edu.

DEAR DR. ROACH »

These days, when vitamin D is recommende­d at every turn, I need to be sure I am taking the right dose. When I took 5,000 IU daily, my blood calcium levels increased and my doctor said to cut back to 2,000 IU daily. Now I read that we should be taking 5,000 IU daily because of COVID-19. Even my 23-year-old grandkids take this dose. Can vitamin D be harmful at these levels?

— J.O.

DEAR READER » During winter, most people north of the line between Atlanta

and Los Angeles are unable to make adequate vitamin D, and low vitamin D levels are common.

However, large studies have failed to show much benefit in routine supplement­ation of vitamin D, and at this time should be used only for people with low vitamin D levels.

People with risk factors for low vitamin D (those with darker skin, who are overweight, get little sun exposure, have osteoporos­is or at risk for poor absorption of vitamin D) should be screened.

When vitamin D levels are low, then supplement­ation is appropriat­e.

Most experts use 6002,000 IU for treatment. Toxicity due to excess vitamin D is unusual at dosages at or below 8,000 IU daily. In my opinion, doses above 2,000 should be guided by measuremen­t of blood levels.

A high calcium level is an indicator of excess vitamin D.

However, the fact that you had high calcium at modest levels of vitamin D replacemen­t makes me wonder if you also have a high level of parathyroi­d hormone.

A high PTH level, usually from a benign tumor of the gland, is the most common cause of persistent­ly high blood calcium levels.

I would recommend you ask your doctor about checking your parathyroi­d hormone level.

Although some studies have found an associatio­n between low vitamin D levels and worse outcomes with COVID-19, vitamin D treatment of people with COVID-19 has so far not been shown to be helpful. Studies are ongoing.

In absence of good data, I would not recommend more than routine supplement­ation to treat or prevent vitamin D deficiency, but a dose of 6001,000 IU daily is unlikely to be harmful and may possibly help.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States