The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Abortion doctor signals she’ll sue Indiana AG over comments

Case involves 10-year-old Ohio girl

- By Arleigh Rodgers

INDIANAPOL­IS » An Indianapol­is doctor who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio took the first step Tuesday toward suing Indiana’s attorney general for defamation.

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapol­is obstetrici­angynecolo­gist who gave the girl a medication-induced abortion on June 30, filed a tort claim notice over what she says are false statements that Attorney General Todd Rokita has made about her and her work.

Bernard received widespread attention after she gave an interview to the Indianapol­is Star about the child, who traveled to Indiana from Ohio for the abortion.

A so-called fetal heartbeat law took effect in Ohio last month after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Such laws ban abortions from the time a fetus’ heartbeat can be detected, which is typically around the sixth week of pregnancy.

A 27-year-old man was charged last week in Columbus, Ohio, with raping the girl, confirming the existence of a case that was initially met with skepticism by some news outlets and Republican politician­s.

Bernard’s lawyer, Kathleen DeLaney, filed the “tort claim notice” against Rokita just days after she sent a cease and desist letter. The claim starts a 90day period for the state to settle it. If it’s not settled, Bernard could file a lawsuit. The claim didn’t say how much money Bernard is seeking, noting that “the harm is ongoing.”

“Mr. Rokita’s false and misleading statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession constitute defamation,” the claim reads. “The statements have been and continue to be published by or on behalf of Mr. Rokita and the Office of the Attorney General.”

After the news of the 10-year-old’s abortion broke, Rokita told Fox he would investigat­e whether Bernard violated child abuse notificati­on or abortion reporting laws. He also said his office would look into whether anything Bernard said to the Indianapol­is Star about the girl’s case violated federal medical privacy laws. Rokita offered no specific allegation­s of wrongdoing.

Records obtained by The Associated Press and local news outlets show that Bernard submitted her report about the girl’s abortion on July 2, which is within Indiana’s required three-day reporting period for an abortion performed on a girl younger than 16.

Rokita did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

The Indiana Democratic Party criticized Rokita for the impact the lawsuit would have on taxpayers.

“Hoosier taxpayers will now have to pay for Attorney General Todd Rokita’s national smear campaign against a doctor who helped a 10-year-old rape survivor attain a legal and safe abortion,” party spokespers­on Drew Anderson wrote in an email. Arleigh Rodgers is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalist­s in local newsrooms to report on undercover­ed issues. Follow her on Twitter at https://twitter.com/ arleighrod­gers

 ?? JENNA WATSON — THE INDIANAPOL­IS STAR VIA AP ?? Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a reproducti­ve health care provider, speaks during an abortion rights rally on June 25, at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapol­is. The lawyer for Bernard, an Indiana doctor at the center of a political firestorm after speaking out about a 10-year-old child abuse victim who traveled from Ohio for an abortion, said July 14, that her client provided proper treatment and did not violate any patient privacy laws in discussing the unidentifi­ed girl’s case.
JENNA WATSON — THE INDIANAPOL­IS STAR VIA AP Dr. Caitlin Bernard, a reproducti­ve health care provider, speaks during an abortion rights rally on June 25, at the Indiana Statehouse in Indianapol­is. The lawyer for Bernard, an Indiana doctor at the center of a political firestorm after speaking out about a 10-year-old child abuse victim who traveled from Ohio for an abortion, said July 14, that her client provided proper treatment and did not violate any patient privacy laws in discussing the unidentifi­ed girl’s case.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States