The News-Times

White House: Migrants to sanctuary cities not a top choice

-

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump wants to explore a twice-rejected proposal to send migrants to “sanctuary cities,” but that is not the preferred solution to fix the straining immigratio­n system, the White House said Sunday.

Press secretary Sarah Sanders said it was one of many options, though she hoped Congress would work with the president on a comprehens­ive immigratio­n overhaul.

The Trump administra­tion is dealing with an ever-increasing number of Central American migrants crossing the U.S.Mexico border, an influx that has pushed the immigratio­n system to the breaking point.

Laws make it hard to quickly return Central Americans, and many of them spend years in the U.S. waiting for their immigratio­n cases to play out. Others claim asylum and wait just as long, living and working in the U.S. as they wait.

“Sanctuary cities” are mostly left-leaning places such as New York City and San Francisco where laws prohibit local police and correction officers from working with immigratio­n officials to help arrest and deport people living here illegally.

Trump seized on reports last week of the proposal that sought to send migrants already detained to Democratic locations or transport migrants that have just crossed the U.S.-Mexico border to sanctuary cities.

Sanders said the idea would be to spread out the number of migrants so the strain would not be on “one or two border communitie­s.”

“The president likes the idea and Democrats have said they want these individual­s into their communitie­s so let’s see if it works and everybody gets a win out of it,” Sanders said. “Again, this is not the ideal situation.” Trump tweeted on Saturday evening that the U.S. had the “absolute legal right to have apprehende­d illegal immigrants transferre­d to Sanctuary Cities.”

But the plan had already been eschewed twice.

People with knowledge of the discussion­s say it was first brought to the Department of Homeland Security from White House staff in November, and was again discussed in February but was put down after DHS officials reviewed it and found it was too costly, a misuse of funds and would be too timely.

The people were not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

It actually could make it more difficult for Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t officers to arrest people facing deportatio­n because sanctuary cities do not work with ICE.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States