The News-Times

More health care choices for small businesses

- Frances G. Padilla is president of the Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticu­t.

As the leader of the Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticu­t, it goes without saying that I want our state to take bold action to ensure that everyone in Connecticu­t has access to affordable and quality health care.

This legislativ­e session offers an opportunit­y to do that. House Bill 7267 and Senate Bill 134 offer the prospects of new, more affordable insurance choices for small businesses with fewer than 50 employees. These two identical bills would also extend more choices to individual­s who struggle to buy insurance on their own and don’t qualify for public subsidies.

The Office of the State Comptrolle­r negotiates health coverage with the insurance and pharmaceut­ical industries for nearly 250,000 state employees and retirees. Like other large employers, the state has strong negotiatin­g power. These new plans would be negotiated by the Comptrolle­r’s office and would be customized to the small employer and individual markets. While not exact replicas of the state employees’ plan, they would benefit from the state’s negotiatin­g leverage to increase their affordabil­ity and drive down underlying prices.

The Foundation is a small nonprofit business that prides itself in offering our staff the best coverage we can afford. Over the years, increased premiums in the small group market have made maintainin­g our coverage a struggle.

We aren’t unique in our experience. Small businesses and nonprofit organizati­ons with fewer than 50 employees struggle to afford health coverage for their employees. Three pressing themes emerged from recent focus groups held right here in Connecticu­t with small business owners.

1. They lose good employees to businesses and nonprofits who can offer better health care benefits.

2. The small group market is failing them — they can’t offer coverage affordable to their employees and they can’t predict how much health care will cost them over several years, so they can prepare accordingl­y.

3. They think it’s reasonable for the state to offer additional choices that they can evaluate alongside private insurance choices.

H.B. 7267 and S.B. 134 were voted out of the Appropriat­ions Committee and are on the calendar to be debated by the Connecticu­t House of Representa­tives and Senate this month.

Small businesses, nonprofits and individual­s in Connecticu­t need and want the positive impact of more affordable coverage than they have now.

Our elected leaders are under significan­t pressure from the state’s budget challenges. They hear from employers that Connecticu­t needs to be more “business-friendly.” Expanding health care choices would go a long way on both fronts. According to the Small Business Administra­tion, small businesses employ more than 700,000 people. That’s nearly half our workforce. Insurers employ about 60,000 people, according to the Connecticu­t Business and Industry Associatio­n — but only a fraction of a percentage of those employees work on coverage specific to the Connecticu­t market. As their opposition makes clear, they don’t seem to like the idea of more competitio­n. Yet healthy competitio­n in health insurance will help small businesses grow and thrive.

Furthermor­e, according to the Connecticu­t Department of Insurance website, Anthem and ConnectiCa­re are the predominan­t insurers in the small group market. Yet Aetna, which reports covering only 7,500 lives, and CIGNA, which does not serve the Connecticu­t small business market at all, have launched a full-court press urging their employees to write their legislator­s opposing “the public option!”

Carriers claim that the small group market is volatile and risky, requiring substantia­l reserves to manage unforeseen utilizatio­n. Maybe that is true, but perhaps the real problem is that carriers can’t realize the profit margins they seek from this market — and that is why many of them already don’t participat­e in it.

In contrast, the Comptrolle­r’s office doesn’t have the goal of making a profit and instead seeks to have quality, affordable coverage available to more Connecticu­t residents.

Our elected leaders need to help our small businesses thrive and take bold action to get this done.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States