The News-Times

Conn. more restrictiv­e on voting rights than Georgia

- By Monte Frank

It may surprise Connecticu­t residents to learn that our Nutmeg State is significan­tly more restrictiv­e than Georgia in voting and ballot access — and that we lag behind many states when you consider photo ID requiremen­ts, early voting and closed-party primaries that disenfranc­hise 40 percent of the electorate.

Our nation’s history of voter suppressio­n has been shamefully directed at people of color. It is troubling that more than 25 states have signed voter suppressio­n bills into law since 2010 and that stricter voting restrictio­ns accelerate­d after a 2013 Supreme Court ruling weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965, legislatio­n aimed at preventing discrimina­tory voting practices.

Although Connecticu­t has not affirmativ­ely acted to suppress voting, it has steadfastl­y held onto its outdated and restrictiv­e rules, which make it a backwater on voting and ballot access. For example, the Land of Steady Habits is one of a handful of states — including Mississipp­i and Alabama — that do not permit early voting (except for pandemics), and Connecticu­t’s photo ID requiremen­ts are more burdensome than many states’.

The General Assembly has consistent­ly resisted common-sense 21stcentur­y reforms that could increase voter participat­ion. For example, it took years and a colossal effort for same-day voting registrati­on to be implemente­d.

In this very session, the Legislatur­e refused to pass even a “study” bill on ranked-choice voting — an increasing­ly common voting reform that assures that elected officials have the support of the majority of voters.

While many in Connecticu­t rightfully criticized Georgia’s recent moves to restrict voting, our ire should also be directed our own house. For example, while Georgia reduced the number of days for early voting to 19, that is 19 more days than the zero days of early voting normally permitted in Connecticu­t. Connecticu­t also severely limits access to absentee ballots by requiring an excuse to vote absentee — like active military service, illness or a religious observance.

In Connecticu­t, it took a pandemic to temporaril­y allow no-excuse absentee voting. However, when the pandemic ends, so, too, will no-excuse absentee voting. The success of noexcuse absentee ballots in Connecticu­t in the 2020 election should provide lawmakers with all the proof needed to make no-excuse absentee ballots a permanent option for voters.

Fortunatel­y, the Connecticu­t General Assembly is now considerin­g three important measures. My group, SAMCT (Serve America Movement-Connecticu­t), urges adoption of these three measures. They are House Joint Resolution 58, which would permit “no-excuse” absentee ballots; House Joint Resolution 59, which would permit early voting; and Senate Bill 820, which would establish a state voting rights act to prevent voter suppressio­n and provide the state Attorney General with new enforcemen­t authority.

Both joint resolution­s would require an amendment to the state Constituti­on, and SAM-CT urges lawmakers to put them on the ballot as soon as November 2022. However, early voting and no-excuse absentee ballots must be just the beginning for Connecticu­t if the goal is to fix the broken political system.

That can be accomplish­ed by enabling fair competitio­n so the best and brightest can emerge victorious on Election Day. Unaffiliat­ed voters, the largest voting bloc, should be allowed to vote in taxpayer-funded open primaries. Ranked-choice voting and open primaries must advance through the legislatur­e and be brought to referendum for the people to decide. In New York City, ranked-choice voting passed in 2019 with 73.5 percent support and will be used in the upcoming mayoral primaries.

We must make no-excuse absentee balloting and early voting permanent options for Connecticu­t voters. Otherwise, we will continue to lag behind Georgia.

Monte Frank, a candidate for lieutenant governor in 2018 with Oz Griebel, chairs SAM-CT, an affiliate of SAM (Serve America Movement), which consists of current and former Democrats, Republican­s and independen­ts who have come together to fix broken politics in America.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States