The News-Times

Season’s greetings in store from the secret JFK files?

- By Carl J. Frattini Carl J. Frattini lives in Guilford.

Is there a “smoking gun” in these files? Of course not.

Within hours of President John F. Kennedy’s murder on Nov. 22, 1963, the country’s horror was stoked into outrage by allegation­s of Lee Harvey Oswald’s purported ties to Fidel Castro. White House transcript­s later reveal Lyndon Johnson, Kennedy’s successor, distressin­g over how this outrage could escalate into demands for an invasion of Cuba. In those moments, the first JFK assassinat­ion conspiracy was born.

Details about the political beliefs and affiliatio­ns of a supposedly obscure loner spread across the country almost as fast as details about the assassinat­ion itself. Who could provide such seemingly persuasive informatio­n about Oswald, so quickly, and to so many people?

These allegation­s did not come from the FBI, the Secret Service, the police or any investigat­ive journalist­s. Instead, they come from a well-organized group of activists called the “DRE” (an abbreviati­on for “Directorio Revolucion­ario Estudianti­l”). The DRE hated Castro. They wanted to see Cuba liberated. And they believed the U.S. should take aggressive action. They were not alone.

In 1963, the DRE were headquarte­red in Miami. They had satellite offices in many major cities, including New Orleans (where some of Oswald’s strangest activities occurred). The DRE’s activities and their funding (today equivalent to about $220,000 per month) are overseen by a man known to them as Howard.

The Warren Commission eventually dispelled the Castro allegation­s. And the U.S. did not got to war with Cuba. The DRE shut down shortly after the assassinat­ion, their name dissolving into history (along with Howard).

Fifteen years pass. In 1978, while a congressio­nal committee is reinvestig­ating JFK’s assassinat­ion, a lawyer is called out of retirement to oversee requests for classified records.

According to committee investigat­ors, the lawyer is notorious for slow-walking or severely limiting the release of files, particular­ly those relating to the DRE and Oswald’s alleged ties to Cuba. Unsurprisi­ngly, the committee runs out of time before ever seeing the requested files.

In 1992, Congress passes a law requiring the National Archives to preserve, catalog and begin releasing all assassinat­ion records, with a final release deadline of October 2017.

In 2001, a journalist researchin­g the DRE uncovers the real identity of Howard in some of these declassifi­ed records. Shockingly, the journalist also learns that Howard and the retired lawyer from 1978 are the same man. Give that a minute to sink in.

Howard is long gone now, but he led an interestin­g life. You may be wondering who he worked for. Rest assured, it was neither the Russians, the Cubans, the Mafia, a wealthy cabal, nor a lone gunman — far from it. Among the 15,000 assassinat­ion records that remain classified, 300 pertain to Howard and the work he did for his well-known employer.

Is there a “smoking gun” in these files? Of course not. But much like The Ghost of Christmas Past, the files shine an uncomforta­ble light. They contain informatio­n that would have dramatical­ly changed the questions being asked during investigat­ions like the Warren Commission (1964) and the House Select Committee (1978). Today, these unasked questions haunt all the assassinat­ion narratives — from the official to the most absurd.

President Trump was supposed to release the remaining files in 2017. Instead, he ordered many of them hidden for another four years. Last month, President Biden approved their release, but he also added a loophole that could allow many to remain hidden. Most of these files are now nearly 60 years old. If the assassinat­ion is a closed case, what is really being protected?

Stay tuned — the answer could be among files that may arrive from the National Archives next month. Some people also believe Santa may arrive next month (although others still dispute the official narrative about him acting alone).

 ?? Associated Press ?? A 1963 portrait of U.S President John F. Kennedy.
Associated Press A 1963 portrait of U.S President John F. Kennedy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States