The News-Times

M&T customer deposits declining

- By Alexander Soule Includes prior reporting by Paul Schott and Luther Turmelle. Alex.Soule@scni.com; @casoulman

Prior to its switchover of People’s United accounts that prompted complaints and scrutiny, M&T Bank saw Connecticu­t deposits drop at a larger number of People’s United Bank branches than those where M&T recorded gains.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. tallies bank deposits annually based on totals each June. In its newest report, the FDIC reported a $4.2 billion drop in M&T deposits in Connecticu­t from the combined total for M&T and People’s United as of June 2021.

That allowed Webster Bank to leapfrog M&T to become Connecticu­t’s second largest bank by customer deposits, after Bank of America. FDIC credits Bank of America with having 25 cents on every dollar on deposit in Connecticu­t, for $44.7 billion in total, with Stamford-based Webster at $25.9 billion in customer deposits as of June and M&T having $24.8 billion.

The large majority of banks in the New York and Connecticu­t markets posted deposit gains over the intervenin­g year — in Connecticu­t none more so than JPMorgan Chase which added $1.4 billion to its state total to push it slightly above the $10 billion threshold for a 16 percent gain.

Across all banks, customers tacked nearly $580 million to their aggregate accounts in Connecticu­t to push the total to a record $179 billion — roughly $39 billion above June 2019 in advance of the COVID-19 pandemic.

M&T acquired People’s United last April, picking up $53 billion in customer deposits across Connecticu­t, New York, Massachuse­tts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. As of June, however, M&T’s deposit total was down by $9.6 billion over 12 months from the combined total it and People’s United had reported separately in June 2021. The decline was dominated by New York and Connecticu­t branches, with the possibilit­y that some customers had moved accounts in advance of the April acquisitio­n date.

Deposit levels can be influenced heavily by companies and municipali­ties changing banks, or branch closures that prompt banks to reassign accounts to another location for geographic or bookkeepin­g purposes.

That appears to have been the case with a huge chunk of People’s United’s deposits on record with the FDIC. M&T estimated a $3.9 billion decline in deposits at the People’s United headquarte­rs branch in downtown Bridgeport, reducing the total there to $3.1 billion as of June.

Across five more retail branches in Bridgeport, however, M&T recorded a 4 percent gain in combined deposits, suggesting customers in People’s United’s home city stuck with their new bank in the early months after the acquisitio­n.

In about 90 of Connecticu­t municipali­ties where M&T had branches in June, however, the company reported deposits dropped in 63 percent of those cities and towns.

Former People’s United customers continue to protest the conversion of their accounts — and got a major new ally on Friday morning. U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., demanded M&T compensate any customers that had automated bill payments rejected or had difficulti­es otherwise accessing their accounts.

Blumenthal has requested a probe by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Reserve on M&T’s preparatio­ns for the switch, alongside senators from Massachuse­tts and Vermont.

Attorney General William Tong had announced his own query days before.

 ?? Alexander Soule/Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? M&T Bank’s regional headquarte­rs office in Bridgeport.
Alexander Soule/Hearst Connecticu­t Media M&T Bank’s regional headquarte­rs office in Bridgeport.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States