The Nome Nugget

Port panel mulls request for wharfage fee discount by commission chair

- By Julia Lerner

Tensions flared during Thursday’s Port Commission meeting as commission­ers discussed exploring changes to the current wharfarge tariff charges for rock, sand and gravel cargo entering and exiting at the Port of Nome.

Commission­ers at the August 19 meeting learned of a request for a volume discount on wharfage rates from Nome’s Board of Trade, Inc., the gravel-shipping arm of Jim West Jr.’s business. West currently chairs the Port Commission, also owns a bar by the same name located on Front Street in Nome.

Currently, the Port of Nome has three charge tiers for rock, sand and gravel shipments. Vessels must pay $2.86 per ton on any rock, sand and gravel load under 2,000 tons, $2.19 per ton for any shipment between 2,000 and 40,000 tons, and $1.85 per ton for any project over 40,000 tons.

In April of this year, West submitted a request with the city and the Port of Nome for a volume discount: a project his company took on would require more than 250,000 tons of gravel shipment, significan­tly more than the 40,000 tier in the current tariff at the Port of Nome.

“According to the tariff, if a project goes over 40,000 tons, a contractor can request a negotiated rate for a single project,” West explained to his fellow commission­ers before recusing himself from discussion­s. “This is a new territory that is out there, and we’ve never had one single project this big, so our tariffs, it’s only a negotiated rate.”

Two other commission­ers, Scot Henderson and Shane Smithhisle­r, participat­ed in discussion­s but did not vote due to concerns regarding conflicts of interest in the project. Commission­er Charlie Lean chaired the commission during the tariff discussion­s.

Commission­ers and city staff discussed who was responsibl­e for negotiatin­g and approving the discount rate request, particular­ly because the request came from a commission­er.

“When I first heard this, I was like, why are we even involved here?” asked Commission­er Scot Henderson. “Isn’t this a city staff issue? The city manager already has the authority to negotiate on behalf of the city to provide discounted rates [in some circumstan­ces], so what makes this different?”

Acting Chairperso­n Charlie Lean explained that special circumstan­ces around this request made the negotiatio­n more complicate­d. “More than one member here has a conflict [of interest] so it puts the port staff at a real disadvanta­ge,” he explained. “Same goes for the city manager. So that kind of dumps it in the lap of the port commission, and that advises the council, but we, too, run that risk of conflict on a bigger scale.”

City Manager Glenn Steckman encouraged commission­ers to explore changing tariff rates on large gravel shipments like this project. “One thing that I have discovered in the last couple months is that, if this port is going to develop, we need to have more competitiv­e rates on larger quantities going through the port,” he said. “What we’re trying to do is to put the port in a better financial shape so that there was going to be money there to address the longterm needs and capital improvemen­ts to the port.”

The request, initially submitted in April, didn’t make it in front of the commission­ers until August for several reasons, including no commission meetings in June due to no quorum and July due to the port’s open house event.

Following over an hour of discussion, Commission­er Russell Rowe, who attended the meeting via zoom, made a motion for the commission to support negotiatio­ns taking place between the Board of Trade and the City of Nome. Of the four commission­ers able to vote on the motion, three voted in favor of it, and one against. Commission­ers Gay Sheffield, Lean, and Row opted to support the motion, while Commission­er Derek McLarty did not. Commission­ers West, Smithhisle­r and Henderson abstained.

In addition to tariff discussion­s, commission­ers heard updates from Harbormast­er Lucas Stotts and Port Director Joy Baker. Stotts shared details about ongoing constructi­on updates and said the port has heard received informatio­n about 27 possible cruise ship stops in Nome next season.

Baker offered details and updates regarding design phase of the Arctic Deep Draft Port and is participat­ing in several technical design meetings.

“After teams were defined, a technical meeting was held on July 29, 2021, to make introducti­ons, review the design components with the Corps and ask technical questions to ensure each of the project scopes reflect the exact layer expected by the other design teams,” she wrote in her commission memo to Steckman.

At this point in time, the Army Corps of Engineers has not scheduled a design charrette for the project, although one has been in the works throughout the summer.

Commission­ers planned a work session regarding port and land infrastruc­ture for Wednesday, August 25, at 5:30 p.m. The goal, they said, was to discuss landside developmen­t, including changes to road layouts, traffic flow, warehouses, storage space, and more.

The next regular port commission meeting is slated to occur at Old St. Joes from 5-8 p.m. on September 16.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States