Maybe anti-toll group is right
Maybe the NoTollsCT folks (and the recent Hearst editorial) are right: The current toll proposal should be scrapped.
Mind you, I’m still protolls and have been for years, but the governor’s latest plan is so insipid and compromised as to be a waste of time. It raises too little money, doesn’t toll millions of out-of-state cars, and most importantly it seems that most people don’t want it. Nor do they trust it will be limited to trucks.
I once described NoTollsCT founder Patrick Sasser as a “bully” because he threatened to oust any legislator that voted for tolls. Remember “Vote for Tolls, Lose at the Polls”?
I was wrong. Sasser is mostly an activist and advocate, and he has done an amazing job organizing opposition to tolling on a shoestring budget of about $10,000 in small donations. Compare that to the million dollars spent in tolls lobbying by the construction industry to little result.
Did you see the Jan. 31 public hearing held at the capital on the governor’s latest tolls bill? The Transportation Committee heard almost 10 hours of testimony, most of it in opposition to the plan. I watched it all thanks to CT-N.
In his testimony, Sasser cited his group’s 40 antitoll rallies, 110,000 petition signatures and 29 towns (representing 1 million residents) that passed resolutions against tolls, and asked lawmakers “what more will it take” to stop tolls.
Sasser isn’t a political professional, just a Stamford firefighter with a side job in construction. But what he has built is amazing. Some say he should run for the Legislature.
I’m jealous of what he’s done and wish someone — anyone — had similarly galvanized those who support tolls. In December, when a handful of protolls folks showed up at the state Capitol, a Senate Democrat staffer greeted them with, “Where have you been?” Nice.
I fundamentally disagree with Sasser that there’s enough waste in state DOT spending to finance repairs of all that’s wrong with our roads and rails. And it’s disingenuous of him to tap into the “no more taxes on anything” sentiment abroad in the land.
For weeks we’ve been promised that a tolls vote was imminent in the Legislature, and for weeks that vote has been postponed. Why? Not because of alleged “scheduling issues” but because the governor clearly doesn’t have the votes he needs to pass his plan.
Remember in May when naive Ned took the media with him into a House Democratic caucus seeking lawmakers’ support on tolls? Lamont admitted to his party members that he’d put them “into a pickle” but promised if they’d support him on tolls he’d help them raise money for their reelection fights.
Now he’s delivering on that promise, adding an extra $300 million to the state’s bonding package to entice needed votes. So much for his “debt diet.” At least lawmakers who vote yes on tolls can tell constituents they “brought home the bacon.”
To many, that’s just good old politics, but it’s unbecoming of a governor who promised us better. The end does not justify the means.
It’s time to scrap the governor’s anemic tolling bill and find an effective way to raise the money we need for transportation, like raising the gas or sales tax. Let’s see how popular that will be.