The Norwalk Hour

New lawsuit seeks to protect women’s athletics

- By Christiana Holcomb

“I believe the rights of women and girls is the unfinished business of the 21st century.” Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and I don’t always agree, but I think she has a point. I’m disappoint­ed to say that the emerging threat to female athletics is truly “unfinished business.”

With surprising speed and little discussion, female athletes across America find themselves poised to compete against biological males (hereafter transgende­r athletes). The range of sports now include baseball, basketball, cross country, cycling, dancing, football, mixed martial arts, soccer, track, volleyball, and wrestling. One local example is the controvers­ial way the Connecticu­t Interschol­astic Athletic Conference has redefined high school athletics — sidelining deserving athletes, shattering dreams, and stealing opportunit­ies from female athletes.

In the name of inclusion, CIAC allows transgende­r athletes to compete without limitation in girls’ athletic competitio­ns if they identify as female. In less than two years, this problemati­c policy has already redefined high school women’s track across the state.

CIAC may pretend that it’s progressiv­e; instead, CIAC is violating Title IX, federal legislatio­n implemente­d over 50 years ago to eliminate discrimina­tion against women in education and athletics while creating equal opportunit­ies for them. Because of CIAC’s regressive policy adjustment­s, two transgende­r athletes have dominated the field, winning championsh­ips in 15 events that were previously held by nine different Connecticu­t girls. In all, two transgende­r athletes have taken over 50 chances to advance to nextlevel races, winning 13 titles previously held by 12 different girls.

Because of CIAC’s policy, I and other attorneys at Alliance Defending Freedom are representi­ng three brave young athletes and their parents in a lawsuit filed in federal court on Feb. 12.

It’s normal for runners to size each other up as they settle into their starting blocks. But now, when Connecticu­t’s elite female athletes already know who’s likely to win the race before it starts, the sport loses its meaning. The whole competitio­n falls apart.

Anyone can guess that biological sex makes a difference in performanc­e. That’s a key premise behind Title IX and the creation of female athletics programs. But the research goes far beyond guesswork. In January, Dr. Gregory A. Brown, Ph.D., an exercise science professor who’s authored more than 40 peerreview­ed publicatio­ns in the field, summarized the available research findings.

Based on his analysis, Brown notes that “[a]t the level of elite competitio­n, men, or adolescent boys, have an advantage over women, or adolescent girls, in almost all athletic contests.” He also emphasizes that biological male physiology serves as the basis for the performanc­e advantage. But also significan­t is Brown’s assessment that giving androgen inhibitors and crosssex hormones to men, or adolescent boys, after male puberty does not eliminate their performanc­e advantage over women or adolescent girls in almost all athletic contests.

No one I know wishes transgende­r athletes any harm. No one questions their value as human

Turning women’s sports into a coed free-for-all simply isn’t a plausible solution for the cultural and social challenges we’re addressing.

beings, athletes, or Americans. But no one can plausibly pretend that affirming their dignity requires the deconstruc­tion of female athletics. Where antifemale policies take hold and are applied to contact sports, women and girls can expect — not simply to miss medals, races, and scholarshi­ps — but to be literally crushed and crowded by the boys filling the arena. Even mediocre male athletes — with their bigger lungs, higher testostero­ne levels, and stronger muscles — can pound their female competitor­s. Turning women’s sports into a coed free-for-all simply isn’t a plausible solution for the cultural and social challenges we’re addressing.

Girls deserve the same opportunit­y as boys to excel and pursue their dreams. But allowing transgende­r athletes to compete in girls’ sports shatters dreams and steals opportunit­ies. Without interventi­on, these young women don’t just lose the opportunit­y to win, but to earn college scholarshi­ps and launch their own careers in athletics, coaching, and more.

American women and girls have a great many rights and opportunit­ies. But the potential demolition of girls and women’s sports remains “unfinished business” that should concern us all.

Christiana Holcomb is legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom (@AllianceDe­fends) and represents three female athletes and their mothers in a federal lawsuit against the Connecticu­t Interschol­astic Athletic Conference.

 ?? Kassi Jackson / Tribune News Service ?? Canton High School senior Chelsea Mitchel speaks during a press conference with Alanna Smith, Danbury High School sophomore, to her left and Selina Soule, Glastonbur­y High School senior, to her right at the Connecticu­t State Capitol Feb. 12. The athletes say they lost out on top finishes and possible scholarshi­p opportunit­ies because a statewide policy allows transgende­r athletes to compete against cisgender girls. Their families filed a federal lawsuit alleging discrimina­tion.
Kassi Jackson / Tribune News Service Canton High School senior Chelsea Mitchel speaks during a press conference with Alanna Smith, Danbury High School sophomore, to her left and Selina Soule, Glastonbur­y High School senior, to her right at the Connecticu­t State Capitol Feb. 12. The athletes say they lost out on top finishes and possible scholarshi­p opportunit­ies because a statewide policy allows transgende­r athletes to compete against cisgender girls. Their families filed a federal lawsuit alleging discrimina­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States