The Oklahoman

Adoption write-offs difficult to achieve

-

People typically fear the words, “I’m from the government. I’m here to help.” Red tape surroundin­g a federal adoption tax credit shows why.

In 2010, Congress increased the adoption tax credit to up to $13,360 and made it refundable for two years, allowing adoptive parents to potentiall­y reduce tax liability to zero and get money for any unused portion of the credit. Supporters felt that this would support families and encourage adoption.

So far, so good. The problem is that obtaining the credit is extremely difficult. Those claiming the credit can’t file returns electronic­ally; the IRS requires paper documentat­ion of adoption expenses. That’s where the trouble begins, according to reports by National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson. She notes that 90 percent of returns claiming the adoption credit during the 2012 filing season were subject to additional review; 69 percent were selected for audits. The average adoption credit correspond­ence audit currently takes 126 days.

However, few are ultimately rejected. Of the $668.1 million in adoption credit claims in tax year 2011, the IRS disallowed just $11 million — or 1.5 percent. The NTA found disturbing bureaucrat­ic bungling at play. The report said auditors asked taxpayers to provide documentat­ion “before reviewing the informatio­n the taxpayers included with their original returns,” which meant submitting the same documentat­ion twice. It didn’t help that IRS examiners “were not knowledgea­ble about the expanded adoption credit” or “how to handle the credit claimed for special needs children.”

Half of 2012 adoption-credit recipients had adjusted gross income of $64,000 or less; the NTA report notes delays “caused financial burden for some eligible taxpayers.” The NTA suggests the IRS “allow efiling of adoption tax credit returns that include substantia­tion in an electronic format.”

Ten or 20 years ago, that would have been innovative; in 2012, it’s a sad indictment of a government too busy “helping” us to do so competentl­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States