Pipeline: New route avoids Nebraska Sandhills region

resistance in Nebraska from a coalition of landowners and environmental groups that say it would contaminate the Ogallala aquifer, a massive groundwater supply. Canadian pipeline developer TransCanada and some unions say the project is safe and will create thousands of jobs.

Surveys commissioned by the University of Nebraska, independent polling firms and industrybacked groups have shown that most Nebraska residents support the project itself, but wanted a route that avoided both the Sandhills and the Ogallala aquifer. Public outrage over the original route prompted Heineman to call state lawmakers into a special session in 2011, but the issue hasn’t gained as much traction in the Legislature after TransCanada agreed to keep the project out of an area that state officials designated as the Sandhills.

TransCanada’s pipeline is designed to carry tar sands oil from Canada across Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. The company also has proposed connecting it to the Bakken oil field in Montana and North Dakota.

The original Nebraska route would have run the pipeline through a region of erodible, grass-covered sand dunes known as the Sandhills. Heineman said in his letter that the new, 195-mile route through Nebraska avoids the Sandhills but would still cross over a small part of the aquifer.

The pipeline’s most vocal critics remain firmly opposed to the project.

“Gov. Heineman just performed one of the biggest flip-flops that we’ve seen in Nebraska political history,” said Jane Kleeb, executive director of the group Bold Nebraska.

Heineman has previously said he would oppose any pipeline route that endangered the aquifer. In his letter to federal officials, Heineman said any spills along the new route would be localized, and any cleanup responsibilities would fall to TransCanada. He also said the project would result in $418.1 million in economic benefits for the state, plus $16.5 million in state tax revenue from the pipeline construction materials.

Kleeb said those estimates came from a study commissioned by TransCanada that included jobcreation numbers which have since been debunked.

Those favoring the Keystone XL project, including such organizations as Americans for Prosperity, the Consumer Energy Alliance and Nebraskans for Jobs and Energy Independence, have cited the nation’s need for more oil and praised its potential economic impact.

Heineman said TransCanada has assured state environmental officials that the company would create an emergency response plan in case of a spill and would test water wells at landowners’ request.

TransCanada executives have said the company will build a pipeline with rigorous safeguards and carry $200 million in third-party liability insurance to cover cleanup costs in Nebraska.

TransCanada CEO and President Russ Girling said Tuesday that the project had passed a strict review and would help national security.

Canada exports most of