The Oklahoman

Vulnerable Dems and Kavanaugh

- Marc Thiessen

It is difficult to imagine any Republican senator opposing President Trump’s nomination to the Supreme Court of Brett Kavanaugh, a judge with impeccable credential­s, strong intellect and sterling character. If Republican­s stay united, Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on as the next associate justice is assured. And no one is praying harder for Republican unity than the three Democratic senators — Joe Manchin, W. Va., Heidi Heitkamp, N.D., and Joe Donnelly, Ind., — who voted to confirm Justice Neil Gorsuch and who are up for re-election this fall in states Donald Trump won by double digits.

A Supreme Court fight is already a nightmare for these vulnerable Democrats. The left understand­s that Kavanaugh’s nomination is an existentia­l threat to its activist judicial agenda, so it is going to throw everything it has at him.

Caught in the crossfire are Manchin, Heitkamp and Donnelly, all of whom were hoping to steer a steady course down the middle to re-election but will now have to spend the next couple of months getting pushed and pulled by both sides. The Democrats’ leftwing base will demand that they vote “no” on Kavanaugh, while the trio’s pro-Trump constituen­ts will demand they vote “yes.” And the confirmati­on fight will dominate the final months of their campaigns.

That’s a nightmare. But so long as Republican­s are united, Manchin, Heitkamp and Donnelly more or less get a free vote. They won’t pay much of a price if they end up as the 51st, 52nd and 53rd votes confirming Trump’s nominee, adding a bipartisan veneer to the final vote. But if any Republican­s defect, the nightmare becomes a disaster, because each of these red-state Democrats suddenly becomes the deciding vote. That is the last thing they want.

If any Democrats provide the swing vote that puts Trump’s nominee on the high court, many on the left will abandon them, hurting their reelection chances. But if they are the deciding vote against Trump’s nominee, then voters in their states — which all voted for Trump decisively — would be more likely throw them out of office anyway. It’s a no-win situation.

Normally, it is the job of a party’s Senate leadership to protect vulnerable incumbents by giving them political cover to do what they need to do to win re-election. But in this case, the Democratic leadership seems to be throwing these three senators under the bus. Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Ill., the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, suggested on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that these vulnerable red-state Democrats should sacrifice their reelection to stop Trump’s nominee. “They understand it’s a historic decision,” he said. “It’s about more than the next election.”

Red-state Democrats want to get this vote over with as quickly as possible. A delayed vote could backfire terribly. Right now, Democrats enjoy a significan­t enthusiasm advantage in the 2018 midterm elections. In a Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll last month, 63 percent of Democrats rate their interest level as a “9 or 10” on a 10-point scale, while only 47 percent of Republican­s do the same.

Any delay in Kavanaugh’s confirmati­on can only help Republican­s close that enthusiasm gap. According to The Washington Post, 26 percent of all Trump voters said the Supreme Court was the most important factor in their vote, compared with just 18 percent among Hillary Clinton’s voters. The Supreme Court motivates the right more than the left. The best way Democrats can guarantee a strong GOP turnout in key Senate races is to make the Supreme Court an election issue this November.

So, conservati­ves are hoping that Republican­s stay united. But deep in their hearts, red-state Democrats are praying for GOP unity as well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States