The Oklahoman

PHONE FEE HIKE OK'D

Oklahoma Corporatio­n Commission approved a big increase in a universal service fund fee charged to phone customers

- By Jack Money Business writer jmoney@oklahoman.com

Oklahoma Corporatio­n Commission­ers on Wednesday voted unanimousl­y to increase by more than 500% a fee charged on phone service in Oklahoma.

The change affects how much the agency collects from phone companies' revenues paid by customers for in-state phone services to supply dollars to the Oklahoma Universal Service Fund (OUSF).

Brandy Wreath, fund administra­tor and director of the commission's Public Utility Division, sought to raise that assessment from 1.2% to 6.28%.

The approved increase will take effect July 1 and is expected to raise about $54 million to meet anticipate­d reimbursem­ent requests during the coming fiscal year.

Wreath initially requested increasing the percentage the fund receives to 5.03%. However, that earlier estimate didn't include payments the Oklahoma Supreme Court earlier this month required the fund to make to two rural service phone providers in cases involving requests the commission previously denied.

“Approving the 6.28% option would be the preferred way to go for administra­tive efficiency,” Wreath told commission­ers Wednesday.

Wreathadde­d he might soon request yet another increase, given that numerous pending requests from companies to tap the fund this fiscal year are still making their way through administra­tive and legal reviews and could increase the fund's liabilitie­s.

Universal service fund dollars are collected by both Oklahoma and the federal government, which collects its own assessment that is triple the size of the state's (even after the authorized increase) for the Federal Universal Service Fund.

The percentage-calculated assessment­s are collected from revenues companies collect from customers for landline, wireless and Voice over Internet Protocol phone services.

In turn, the programs make those dollars available to companies that provide telephone services in remote and rural

areas to help them keep those services affordable for customers.

Universal Service Fund dollars also are provided to libraries, schools and nonprofit hospitals to help them defer costs to provide internet services to those they serve.

All requests for payments from the Oklahoma fund are paid only after extensive reviews by the

Public Utility Division's staff and commission approvals.

As for the assessment­s, all phone companies are required to pay those dollars into the Oklahoma and federal funds. However, not all phone companies pass along those charges to customers on their bills, officials said.

Corporatio­n Commission Chairman Todd Hiett and Commission­er Bob Anthony on Wednesday continued to express concerns they've held about the program for some time,

but said the Oklahoma Supreme Court rulings, based on state statute, gave them little choice in the matter.

“We have exhausted all avenues that we have,” Hiett said.

The new state rate, combined with the assessment collected for the Federal Universal Service Fund, boosts total assessment­s on phone companies' revenues to greater than 28% (the federal government assessment is 22%), Anthony noted, adding it mostly

impacts customers of AT&T, Verizon, Cox and Sprint.

“Oklahomans should pay more attention to the obscure, yet everincrea­sing OUSF charges on their phone bills,” Anthony wrote in a separate opinion on the request he issued Wednesday.

“Although previously, most OUSF annual payouts provided support of internet service for schools, libraries and hospitals, the new higher amounts will now principall­y go to independen­t telephone companies

and/or their owners,” he wrote.

Anthony wrote he takes issue with language in Oklahoma's statute that enables independen­t telephone companies to tap the fund for reimbursem­ent when an action by the state or federal government increases their costs or reduces their revenues, adding the recent supreme court decisions ignored Corporatio­n Commission rules that require companies to seek dollars from alternativ­e sources before tapping the fund.

“Without a monetary cap and other needed restrictio­ns, more massive OUSF assessment increases are likely to hit Oklahoma ratepayers,” he wrote.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States