The Oklahoman

Report: Conservati­ves not censored on platforms

- By Jessica Guynn USA TODAY

Despite repeated charges of anti-cons er vat ive bias from former President Trump and other GOP critics, Facebook, Twitter and Google' s You Tube are not slanted against rightleani­ng users, a new report out of New York University found.

Like previous research, “False Accusation: The Unfounded Claim that Social Media Companies Censor Conservati­ves,” concludes that, rather than censoring conservati­ves, social media platforms amplify their voices.

“Republican­s, or more broadly conservati­ves, have been spreading a form of disinforma­tion on how they're treated on social media. They complain they're censored and suppressed but, not only is there not evidence to support that, what evidence exists actually cuts in the other direction,” said Paul Barrett, deputy director of the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, which released the report Monday.

The report lands as a unifying argument is taking shape that major forces in American society – big media, big government, big business – are muzzling conservati­ves. That argument intensifie­d after the major social media platforms suspended Trump out of fear he would incite violence following the U.S. Capitol attack.

“There is abroad campaign going on from the right to argue that they're being silenced or cast aside, and that spirit is what is helping to feed the extremism that we are seeing in our country right now,” Barrett said. “We can't just allow that to be a debating point. It's not legitimate. It's not supported by the facts.”

Many groups across the political spectrum feel their opinions and perspectiv­es are under siege when social media platforms moderate content, researcher­s say, but it's difficult to make the case that these platforms are biased against any one group since the platforms disclose so little about how they decide what content is allowed and what is not.

For their part, Facebook and Twitter say their platforms strike a balance between promoting free expression and removing hate, abuse and mis informatio­n. They acknowledg­e making enforcemen­t errors but insist their policies are applied fairly to everyone.

Conservati­ve author Denise McAllister does not see it that way. And she's called on the social media platforms to stop moderating speech altogether.

“This is a platform, right? You don't need to act like mama Twitter or mama Facebook. Just let people say what they are going to say, whether it's true, false, whatever ,” she recently told USA TODAY .“You have to just trust the people as individual­s and not to try to impose power because you are going to do it inconsiste­ntly.”

CEO Mark Zuckerberg said last week that Facebook would no longer recommend political and civic groups to users and would downplay politics in people's News Feeds.

Vast majority of conservati­ves say social media censors them

A recent poll shows that majorities in both parties think political censorship is likely occurring on social media, but that belief is most prevalent on the political right.

Nine in 10 Republican­s and independen­ts whole an toward the Republican Party say it' s at least somewhat likely that social media platforms censor political viewpoints they find objectiona­ble, up slightly from 85% in 2018, according to an August report f rom the Pew Research Center.

The perception that social media platforms censor conservati­ves is regularly circulated by Fox News hosts, GOP lawmakers in congressio­nal hearing sand online pundits. That, in turn, has intensifie­d GOP calls to reform Section 230 of the Communicat­ions Decency Act, which shields social media companies from legal liability for what their users post and gives platforms immunity when moderating “objectiona­ble” content.

Democrats, including Biden, criticize pandemic, election misinforma­tion

Bipartisan support to restrain the vast power held by a handful of large corporatio­ns grew during the Trump administra­tion and shows no signs of ebbing as Democrats retake the White House.

Social media platforms have been judged harshly by both parties for how they policed content over the past year, from the COVID-19 pandemic to election-related mis informatio­n and disinforma­tion.

Democrats, including Biden, say the social media platforms don't restrict or remove enough harmful content, particular­ly hate speech, extremism, hoaxes and false hoods. They have called on companies to play a bigger and more responsibl­e role in curating public debate.

Those on the right say these platforms have too much latitude to restrict and remove content and target conservati­ves based on their political beliefs.

Those grievances boiled over when Facebook, Twitter and You Tube suspended Trump' s accounts, citing the risk that he would use his social media megaphone to in cite more violence before the end of his term.

After being per manently suspended f rom Twitter, Trump accused the company of “banning free speech” in cahoots with “the Democrats and Radical Left.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States