The Oklahoman

Rift between legislativ­e leaders intensifies

House, Senate leaders butt heads over bill

- Carmen Forman

Leaders of the Oklahoma Legislatur­e are in the midst of a political showdown that has one conservati­ve activist calling for the head of the state Senate to be removed from his leadership position.

Republican leaders of the Oklahoma House and Senate are deeply divided on legislatio­n that would allow the state legislatur­e to nullify presidenti­al executive orders, congressio­nal actions and federal agency rules.

Senate Pro Tem Greg Treat’s decision not to hear House Bill 1236 in its original form has the president of the powerful Oklahoma Second Amendment Associatio­n calling for Treat to be removed as Oklahoma’s top senator.

Part of HB 1236 that would allow Oklahoma’s attorney general or a majority of the legislatur­e to nullify federal actions by declaring them unconstitu­tional was a violation of the government’s separation of powers, Treat said.

Grassroots opposition

On the Senate floor Tuesday, Treat defended his decision to amend the bill to create a unit within the attorney general’s office to evaluate federal actions and defend the state’s rights.

“You do not push back on the federal government by willfully violating the very Constituti­on that we’re sworn to uphold,” he said. “You do not protect the Constituti­on by willfully violating it.”

Supporters of HB 1236, by House Speaker Charles McCall, said the Senate-approved version of the bill doesn’t measure up.

Oklahoma Second Amendment Associatio­n President Don Spencer called Treat’s proposal “garbage,” and said he stands by his call for Treat to be removed from his leadership post. Spencer organized a “Rally for Liberty” at the Capitol on Tuesday to decry the “federal government’s assault on our rights.”

A few of the more than 200 rallygoers in the Capitol Rotunda carried signs that said, “Don’t Treat on Me.”

Citing the roughly 100 GOP legislator­s who backed HB 1236, Spencer said it’s clear there’s widespread support for state government leaders to act as a check on the federal government, and prevent federal overreach.

“It’s a very strong message that we want our rights protected, and we want our attorney general and our state legislatur­e to do it,” Spencer said.

Treat chided Spencer, noting the Second Amendment Associatio­n doesn’t even list HB 1236 among its top priorities on the group’s website.

Much of the discussion surroundin­g HB 1236 has been focused on the next election cycle rather than on enacting sound policy, Treat said.

He said he’d heard a common theme that GOP legislator­s could tout HB 1236, and by extension, challengin­g the Biden administra­tion, on the campaign trail.

But Treat, who is serving in his final, four-year term in the Senate, said lawmakers shouldn’t vote based on what might help them in their next election.

“That’s not why we’re here,” he said. “We’re here to govern and govern responsibl­y and govern in a constituti­onal manner.”

Sen. Julia Kirt, D-Oklahoma City, called Treat’s proposal a stunt that would cost the state $10 million annually for a unit within the attorney general’s office that’s being created just so Republican­s can earn political points.

House Republican­s clap back

House Republican­s responded to Treat’s changes to HB 1236 by sending the Senate a new bill with language nearly identical to what the Senate leader cut out of the original bill.

Through a convoluted process involving special rules, House Republican­s fast-tracked House Bill 1237 through the House with the intent of sending a message to the Senate.

“I’m proud the House again stepped up to pass another strong measure after the Senate leader amended HB 1236 into a toothless paperweigh­t,” said Rep. Mark McBride, R-Moore.

McBride, an author of HB 1236, said he thinks the two chambers can agree to the language in HB 1237.

HB 1237 doesn’t allocate any state funds, and it still allows the legislatur­e and attorney general to review presidenti­al executive orders. HB 1237 would still allow the legislatur­e to declare a federal action unconstitu­tional, but would also have to seek for a court to declare the action unconstitu­tional.

House Minority Leader Emily Virgin, D-Norman, called the actions of the GOP majority a waste of taxpayer resources in order to score political points against the Biden administra­tion.

“Today, the House showed that winning an argument with the Senate is worth sacrificing transparen­cy and House precedence that has most likely existed since statehood,” she said. “The most dishearten­ing thing about this bad governance is that it isn’t for anything that will actually help Oklahomans.”

 ??  ?? Treat
Treat

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States