The Oklahoman

House approves Biden’s $3.5T budget blueprint

Deal with moderates puts agenda back on track

- Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking

WASHINGTON – Striking a deal with moderates, House Democratic leaders muscled President Joe Biden’s multitrill­ion-dollar budget blueprint over a key hurdle Tuesday, ending a risky standoff and putting the party’s domestic infrastruc­ture agenda back on track.

The 220-212 vote was a first step toward drafting Biden’s $3.5 billion rebuilding plan this fall, and the narrow outcome, in the face of stiff Republican opposition, showed the power a few voices have to alter the debate and signaled the challenges ahead still threatenin­g to upend the president’s agenda.

After a turbulent 24 hours that brought House proceeding­s to a standstill, Speaker Nancy Pelosi told her colleagues before the vote that the legislatio­n represents a federal investment on par with the New Deal and the Great Society.

Pelosi brushed aside the delays. “That’s just part of the legislativ­e process,” she said, according to an aide granted anonymity to discuss a closeddoor caucus meeting.

Tensions had flared as a band of moderate lawmakers threatened to withhold their votes for the $3.5 trillion plan. They were demanding the House first approve a nearly $1 trillion bipartisan package of other public works projects that’s already passed the Senate.

In brokering the compromise, Pelosi committed to voting on the bipartisan package no later than Sept. 27, an attempt to assure lawmakers it won’t be left on the sidelines. It’s also in keeping with with Pelosi’s insistence that the two bills move together as a more complete collection of Biden’s priorities. Pelosi has set a goal of passing both by Oct. 1.

Easing off the stalemate will shelve, for now, the stark divisions between moderate and progressiv­e lawmakers who make up the Democrats’ so-slim House majority. But as the drama spilled out during what was supposed to be a quick session as lawmakers returned to work for a few days in August, it showcased the party differences that threaten to upend Biden’s ambitious rebuilding agenda.

With Republican­s opposed to the president’s big plans, the Democratic leaders have just a few votes to spare. That gives any band of lawmakers leverage that can be used to make or break a deal, as they are in position to do in the weeks to come as moderates and progressiv­es draft and vote on the broader $3.5 trillion package.

“I think it’s important to those of us who are moderate Democrats to make sure that our voices are heard,” said Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., one of the negotiator­s.

Challengin­g their party’s most powerful leaders, nine moderate Democrats signed onto a letter late last week raising their objections to proceeding with Biden’s broader infrastruc­ture proposal without first considerin­g the smaller public works plan that has already passed the Senate.

Their ranks grew as other moderates raised similar concerns.

Progressiv­es were outraged at the moderates, blaming them for potentiall­y jamming Biden’s agenda, which is stocked with hard-fought party goals like child care, paid family leave and Medicare expansion, along with green infrastruc­ture spending.

Outside groups, including Justice Democrats, started running campaign ads and members of Our Revolution, the organizati­on aligned with Bernie Sanders, protested Tuesday outside the New Jersey office of Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a leader of the moderate effort.

“This is a ‘which side are you on’ moment,” said Our Revolution executive director Joseph Geevarghes­e, who promised to “organize like never before to hold Democrats accountabl­e and get this bill over the finish line.”

The budget measure is at the heart of Biden’s “Build Back Better” vision for helping families and combating climate change and is progressiv­es’ top priority, all of it largely financed with tax increases on the rich and big business.

The House committees are already fast at work drafting legislatio­n to fill in the details of the $3.5 trillion package for considerat­ion later this fall.

Progressiv­es signaled early that they wanted the Biden budget priorities first before they agree to the smaller Senate package, worried it would be an insufficient down-payment on his goals.

But the moderates want the opposite, insisting Congress quickly send the smaller, bipartisan infrastruc­ture measure they helped shape with the senators to Biden so he can sign it before the political winds shift.

While the moderates insist they also want to support Biden’s broader package, progressiv­es are skeptical. Senate centrists Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., have said they cannot support a $3.5 trillion package.

In fact, the moderates were also trying to win assurances from Pelosi that whatever version of the broader bill they draft in the House will be the same in the Senate – setting up another showdown between the party’s competing flanks and their vision for the rebuilding priorities.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi committed to voting on the $3.5 billion bipartisan infrastruc­ture package no later than Sept. 27.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP House Speaker Nancy Pelosi committed to voting on the $3.5 billion bipartisan infrastruc­ture package no later than Sept. 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States