The Oklahoman

The Supreme Court rules to end eviction moratorium; says CDC oversteppe­d.

Majority: CDC extension overreach of its power

- Mark Sherman

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court is allowing evictions to resume across the United States, blocking the Biden administra­tion from enforcing a temporary ban that was put in place because of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

The court’s action ends protection­s for roughly 3.5 million people in the United States who said they faced eviction in the next two months, according to Census Bureau data from early August.

The court, in a 6-3 decision, said late Thursday in an unsigned opinion that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which reimposed the moratorium Aug. 3, lacked the authority to do so under federal law without explicit congressio­nal authorizat­ion. The six conservati­ve justices rejected the administra­tion’s arguments in support of the CDC’s authority.

“If a federally imposed eviction moratorium is to continue, Congress must specifically authorize it,” the court wrote.

The three liberal justices dissented. Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the three, pointed to the increase in COVID-19 caused by the delta variant as one of the reasons the court should have left the moratorium in place. “The public interest strongly favors respecting the CDC’s judgment at this moment, when over 90% of counties are experienci­ng high transmissi­on rates,” Breyer wrote.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the administra­tion was “disappoint­ed” by the decision and said President Joe Biden “is once again calling on all entities that can prevent evictions – from cities and states to local courts, landlords, Cabinet Agencies – to urgently act to prevent evictions.”

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., who had camped outside the Capitol as the eviction moratorium expired at the end of last month, said Congress must act to reinstate the protection­s.

“We are in an unpreceden­ted and ongoing crisis that demands compassion­ate solutions that center the needs of the people and communitie­s most in need of our help. We need to give our communitie­s time to heal from this devastatin­g pandemic,” she said in a statement.

Biden acknowledg­ed the legal headwinds the new moratorium would likely encounter. But he said that even with doubts about what courts would do, it was worth a try because it would buy at least a few weeks of time for the distributi­on of more of the $46.5 billion in rental assistance Congress had approved.

The Treasury Department said Wednesday that the pace of distributi­on has increased and nearly a million households have been helped. But only about 11% of the money, just over $5 billion, has been distribute­d by state and local government­s, the department said.

The administra­tion has called on state and local officials to “move more aggressive­ly” in distributi­ng rental assistance funds and urged state and local courts to issue their own moratorium­s to “discourage eviction filings” until landlords and tenants have sought the funds.

A handful of states, including California, Maryland and New Jersey, have put in place temporary bans on evictions.

 ?? BRITTAINY NEWMAN/AP FILE ?? Housing advocates protest Aug. 4 in New York. The Supreme Court is allowing evictions to resume across the U.S.
BRITTAINY NEWMAN/AP FILE Housing advocates protest Aug. 4 in New York. The Supreme Court is allowing evictions to resume across the U.S.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States