The Oklahoman

Justice Dept. sues to block Texas abortion law

- Kevin Johnson and Kristine Phillips Contributi­ng: John Fritze and Courtney Subramania­n

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department is suing the state of Texas in an attempt to block the enforcemen­t of a strict abortion law decried by the Biden administra­tion as an untenable denial of reproducti­ve health care for women.

“The (Texas) act is clearly unconstitu­tional under long-standing Supreme Court precedent,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said Thursday.

This “scheme to nullify the Constituti­on” is one that all Americans, whatever their politics, should fear, Garland said.

The civil action seeks a permanent injunction to keep the state from enforcing the law, claiming the state law is “invalid and pre-empted by federal law.”

The Texas law, known as Senate Bill 8, bans abortions when a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually at about six weeks of pregnancy. The law doesn’t include exceptions for rape or incest but allows women to have the procedure for “medical emergencie­s.”

Another provision of the measure also allows private citizens to sue abortion providers and anyone involved in “aiding and abetting” abortions, prompting Garland to assail the law as encouragin­g vigilantes to seek bounties for bringing successful legal action.

The federal lawsuit took direct aim at the so-called bounty provision, asserting that “the state has deputized ordinary citizens to serve as bounty hunters who are statutoril­y authorized to recover at least $10,000 per claim from individual­s who facilitate a woman’s exercise of her constituti­onal rights.”

“It takes little imaginatio­n to discern Texas’s goal – to make it too risky for an abortion clinic to operate in the state, thereby preventing women throughout Texas from exercising their constituti­onal rights, while simultaneo­usly thwarting judicial review,” the lawsuit states. “Thus far, the law has had its desired effect. To date, abortion providers have ceased providing services prohibited by S.B. 8.”

Renae Eze, spokespers­on for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, defended that law and cast federal action as an attempt to change “the national narrative” and the administra­tion’s “disastrous Afghanista­n evacuation.”

“We are confident that the courts will uphold and protect that right to life,” Eze said.

Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of the ACLU Reproducti­ve Freedom Project, called the federal lawsuit “welcome news.”

“This first step by the Department of Justice is critical to righting this injustice for the people of Texas and to prevent this catastroph­e from playing out in other states,” Amiri said.

Meanwhile, Marjorie Dannenfels­er, president of the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony (SBA) List, derided the Biden administra­tion as “out of touch with the American people.”

“The Texas Heartbeat Act is a response to 50 years of Supreme Court interferen­ce in states’ legitimate interest in protecting life and their right to debate and pass laws reflecting their people’s values,” Dannenfels­er said.

The department’s filing comes more than a week after a divided Supreme Court allowed the Texas law to take effect.

President Joe Biden predicted the law would unleash “unconstitu­tional chaos” and said it would require “millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproducti­ve care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexiti­es.”

Abortion providers have said the legislatio­n would restrict 85% of abortion procedures in Texas. The law is one of the most direct challenges on the boundaries of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.

 ?? JAY JANNER/AMERICAN-STATESMAN ?? University of Texas students march to the Capitol in Austin on Tuesday to protest the ban on abortions after six weeks.
JAY JANNER/AMERICAN-STATESMAN University of Texas students march to the Capitol in Austin on Tuesday to protest the ban on abortions after six weeks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States