The Oklahoman

House passes bill protecting abortion rights

GOP opposition likely to doom it in Senate

-

WASHINGTON – The House passed legislatio­n Friday that would guarantee a woman’s right to an abortion, an effort by Democrats to circumvent a new Texas law that has placed that access under threat.

The bill’s 218-211 approval is mostly symbolic, as Republican opposition will doom it in the Senate.

Still, Democrats say they are doing all they can to codify the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision after the Supreme Court recently allowed the Texas law banning most abortions in the state to take effect. The court will hear arguments in December in a separate Mississipp­i bid to overturn the landmark decision.

Despite the long odds in his chamber, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement after the vote that “Congress must assert its role to protect the constituti­onal right to abortion” and that the Senate would hold a vote “in the very near future.”

Codifying the Roe ruling would mean creating a right to abortion in federal law, a monumental change that would make it harder for courts and states to impose restrictio­ns.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that congressio­nal action would make a “tremendous difference” in Democrats’ efforts to maintain access to abortion rights. She called the Supreme Court’s decision “shameful” and counter to its own precedent.

Pelosi said just ahead of Friday’s vote that it should “send a very positive message to the women of our country – but not just the women, to the women and their families, to everyone who values freedom, honors our Constituti­on and respects women.”

No Republican­s voted for the legislatio­n, which would supersede state laws on the subject, give health care providers the right to perform abortions and patients the right to receive them. Republican­s argue it would prevent states from setting requiremen­ts like parental involvemen­t and could weaken laws that allow doctors to refuse to perform an abortion.

The legislatio­n “isn’t about freedom for women, it’s about death for babies,” said Republican Rep. Vicky Hartzler of Missouri.

She said it would eliminate protection­s for women and girls who may be coerced into having abortions.

“It ends the life of a living human being with a plan and a purpose from God and who deserves to live,” Hartzler said.

Only one member crossed party lines – Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, who voted against the bill.

The vote came as Democrats have spoken boldly about fighting the Supreme Court – which has a more conservati­ve tilt after Justice Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed last year – but struggled privately to find an effective strategy.

They control Congress by the slimmest of margins, including the evenly split 50-50 Senate, making the prospects of a successful legislativ­e response difficult.

The party has split, in some cases, over how far Washington must go to preserve access to abortions. Liberal lawmakers backed by advocates of reproducti­ve rights who helped power President Joe Biden to office want to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court to rebalance power, changing the rules if needed to lower the 60vote threshold typically required in the Senate to advance legislatio­n.

“Democrats can either abolish the filibuster and expand the court, or do nothing as millions of peoples’ bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for farright minority rule,” tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. “This shouldn’t be a difficult decision.”

But other Democrats – Biden among them – have been wary of such a move.

President Joe Biden supports the House bill and called the court’s ruling on Texas an “unpreceden­ted assault on a woman’s constituti­onal rights.” He has directed multiple agencies to conduct a government-wide effort to ensure women have abortion access and to protect health care providers. But he has not endorsed the idea of adding justices to the Supreme Court, instead forming a commission to study the idea.

The court’s decisions on abortion could prompt political tensions among Republican­s, as well.

Former President Donald Trump was able to secure three new conservati­ve Supreme Court justices because Republican leadership in Congress led by GOP leader Mitch McConnell paved the way. Now, as the court upheld the strict new Texas aw outlawing most abortions in the state, the political fallout will test the limits of that strategy.

Women and advocates of abortion rights are quickly mobilizing to take on not just those Republican­s, but also the big businesses that backed them, aiming squarely at those that contribute­d to many of the Texas Republican­s behind the abortion law.

“They will be met with a fierce response from women and people across the country,” said Sonja Spoo, director of Reproducti­ve Rights Campaigns at UltraViole­t, an advocacy organizati­on, in an interview.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican who supports abortion rights, says the Texas law is “harmful and extreme” and she supports codifying Roe.

But she says the House bill goes “way beyond” that and could threaten the rights of doctors who refuse to perform abortions on religious or moral grounds, for example.

“I support codifying Roe, and I am working with some of my colleagues in the Senate on legislatio­n that would do so,” Collins said in a statement.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, leads a news conference before Friday’s House vote on abortion legislatio­n in Washington.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, leads a news conference before Friday’s House vote on abortion legislatio­n in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States