The Oklahoman

Africa works to replicate own vaccine

- Lori Hinnant, Maria Cheng and Andrew Meldrum

CAPE TOWN, South Africa – In a pair of Cape Town warehouses converted into a maze of airlocked sterile rooms, young scientists are assembling and calibratin­g the equipment needed to reverse engineer a coronaviru­s vaccine that has yet to reach South Africa and most of the world’s poorest people.

The energy in the gleaming labs matches the urgency of their mission to narrow vaccine disparitie­s. By working to replicate Moderna’s COVID-19 shot, the scientists are effectively making an end run around an industry that has vastly prioritize­d rich countries over poor in both sales and manufactur­ing.

And they are doing it with unusual backing from the World Health Organizati­on, which is coordinati­ng a vaccine research, training and production hub in South Africa along with a related supply chain for critical raw materials. It’s a last-resort effort to make doses for people going without, and the intellectu­al property implicatio­ns are still murky.

“We are doing this for Africa at this moment, and that drives us,” said Emile Hendricks, a 22-year-old biotechnol­ogist for Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines, the company trying to reproduce the Moderna shot. “We can no longer rely on these big superpower­s to come in and save us.”

Some experts see reverse engineerin­g – recreating vaccines from fragments of publicly available informatio­n – as one of the few remaining ways to redress the power imbalances of the pandemic. Only 0.7% of vaccines have gone to low-income countries so far, while nearly half have gone to wealthy countries, according to an analysis by the People’s Vaccine Alliance.

That WHO, which relies upon the goodwill of wealthy countries and the pharmaceut­ical industry for its continued existence, is leading the attempt to reproduce a proprietar­y vaccine demonstrat­es the depths of the supply disparitie­s.

The U.N.-backed effort to even out global vaccine distributi­on, known as COVAX, has failed to alleviate dire shortages in poor countries. Donated doses are coming in at a fraction of what is needed to fill the gap. Meanwhile, pressure for drug companies to share, including Biden administra­tion demands on Moderna, has led nowhere.

Until now, WHO has never directly taken part in replicatin­g a novel vaccine for current global use over the objections of the original developers. The Cape Town hub is intended to expand access to the novel messenger RNA technology that Moderna, as well as Pfizer and German partner BioNTech, used in their vaccines.

Dr. Tom Frieden, the former head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has described the world as “being held hostage” by Moderna and Pfizer, whose vaccines are considered the most effective against COVID-19.

Arguing that American taxpayers largely funded Moderna’s vaccine developmen­t, the Biden administra­tion has insisted the company must expand production to help supply developing nations. The global shortfall through 2022 is estimated at 500 million and 4 billion doses.

 ?? JEROME DELAY/AP ?? “We are doing this for Africa at this moment, and that drives us,” says Emile Hendricks, a biotechnol­ogist at Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines in Cape Town, South Africa.
JEROME DELAY/AP “We are doing this for Africa at this moment, and that drives us,” says Emile Hendricks, a biotechnol­ogist at Afrigen Biologics and Vaccines in Cape Town, South Africa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States