The Oklahoman

House Dems delay social bill vote

With few votes to spare, president works phone

- Lisa Mascaro and Alan Fram

WASHINGTON – Top Democrats abruptly postponed an expected House vote Friday on their 10-year, $1.85 trillion social and environmen­t measure as leaders’ long struggle to balance demands from progressiv­es and moderates again dogged the pillar of President Joe Biden’s domestic agenda.

In a bid to hand him a needed victory, leaders still prepared to try pushing an accompanyi­ng $1 trillion package of road and other infrastruc­ture projects through the chamber and to his desk.

But even that popular bill’s fate was in doubt. Progressiv­es threatened to vote against it, continuing their demand that the two measures be voted on together to pressure moderates to support the larger, more expansive social measure. It seemed possible that Democrats might delay the infrastruc­ture vote as well to avoid an embarrassi­ng defeat.

The scrambled plans cast a fresh pall over a party that’s tried for weeks to find middle ground on its massive package of health, education, family and climate change initiative­s. That’s been hard, in part because Democrats’ slender majorities mean they need the support of every Senate Democrat and can have no more than three defectors in the House.

Democratic leaders had hoped to see the House approve both measures on Friday, producing twin triumphs for a president and party eager to rebound from this week’s deflating off-year elections and show they can govern.

But those plans were dashed when, after hours of talks, a half-dozen moderates insisted they would vote against the sprawling social and climate bill unless the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office first provided its cost estimate for the measure.

Democratic leaders have said that would take days or more. With Friday’s delay and lawmakers’ plans to leave town for a week’s break, that could mean the budget estimates would be ready by the time a vote is held.

“In order to make progress on the president’s vision, it is important that we advance the Bipartisan Infrastruc­ture Framework and the Build Back Better Act today,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wrote to her colleagues, using the White House names for the two measures. She added, “The agenda that we are advancing is transforma­tive and historic, hence challengin­g.”

The infrastruc­ture measure cleared the Senate easily in August with bipartisan support, including the backing of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. The package would provide huge sums for every state for highway, rail, mass transit, broadband, airport, drinking and waste water, power grids, ports and other projects.

But that bill became a pawn in the long struggle for leverage between Democrats’ progressiv­es and moderates. Progressiv­es said they would back the infrastruc­ture legislatio­n only if the two measures were voted on together.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., who leads the 95-member Congressio­nal Progressiv­e Caucus, revived that timing link Friday, saying the White House and Congress’ nonpartisa­n Joint Committee on Taxation had provided all the fiscal informatio­n lawmakers needed for the broad bill.

“If our six colleagues still want to wait for a CBO score, we would agree to give them that time – after which point we can vote on both bills together,” she wrote. That strongly suggested that at least some progressiv­es would vote Friday against the infrastruc­ture bill.

That would sink the infrastruc­ture measure unless enough Republican­s backed so that it passed anyway, which seemed unlikely. That could mean Pelosi, who has long refused to have votes on any bills unless she knows Democrats will win, would choose that path again and decide against allowing an infrastruc­ture vote until both bills are ready to go.

Earlier Friday, Biden, said he was going “to make some calls” to lawmakers. He said he would ask them to “vote yes on both these bills right now.”

Democrats are eager to quickly notch accomplish­ments days after a gubernator­ial election defeat in Virginia and disappoint­ing contests elsewhere.

House passage of Biden’s larger measure would send it to the Senate, where it would face certain changes and more Democratic drama.

That’s chiefly because of demands by Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona to contain the measure’s costs and curb or drop some of its initiative­s.

But House approval of the smaller, bipartisan infrastruc­ture measure would send it directly to the White House, where Biden would be certain to take a victory lap. That bill is projected to create mountains of jobs.

Pelosi met late Thursday with Hispanic lawmakers wanting the larger measure to go as far as possible in helping immigrants remain in the U.S. Their prospects for bold action are limited by strict Senate rules, though. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., said Friday that they’d discussed moving on the issue in other bills and considered Pelosi an ally.

Half the size of Biden’s initial $3.5 trillion package, the bill exceeds 2,100 pages and has support from progressiv­e lawmakers, even though it is smaller than they wanted.

Republican­s oppose the measure as too expensive and damaging to the economy.

The package would provide large numbers of Americans with assistance to pay for health care, raising children and caring for elderly people at home. There would be lower prescripti­on drug costs as Medicare for the first time would be able to negotiate with pharmaceut­ical companies for lower prices for some drugs, a long-sought Democratic priority.

The package would provide about $555 billion in tax breaks encouragin­g cleaner energy and electric vehicles. Democrats added key provisions in recent days, restoring a new paid family leave program and work permits for immigrants.

Much of the package’s cost would be covered with higher taxes on wealthier Americans and large corporatio­ns.

Manchin has panned the new family leave program, which is expected to provide four weeks of paid time off, less than the 12 weeks once envisioned.

Senators are also likely to strip out a just-added immigratio­n provision that would let 7 million immigrants in the country without legal standing apply for up to two five-year work permits.

 ?? CAROLYN KASTER/AP ?? Sen. Joe Manchin, D-WVa., left and Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, walk together on Capitol Hill. Manchin has demanded to contain the costs of a multitrill­ion-dollar domestic agenda.
CAROLYN KASTER/AP Sen. Joe Manchin, D-WVa., left and Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, walk together on Capitol Hill. Manchin has demanded to contain the costs of a multitrill­ion-dollar domestic agenda.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States