The Oklahoman

ICE surveillan­ce has info on most Americans

New report details how people tracked through utility bills, licenses, cars

- Amanda Pérez Pintado

“It’s very concerning because this has been done without congressio­nal oversight, often without the awareness of state and local representa­tives.” Dan Bateyko Co-author of “American Dragnet: Data-Driven Deportatio­n in the 21st Century”

Your informatio­n could end up in the hands of Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t you apply for a driver’s license, drive on the roads or sign up for utilities, a new report has found.

ICE has built a surveillan­ce infrastruc­ture that gives the agency access to data on most people living in the U.S. and has gone well beyond its immigratio­n enforcemen­t duties to become a broader domestic surveillan­ce agency, according to an investigat­ion released by Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology.

“Surveillan­ce through the Department of Homeland Security is much broader than people realize. It is truly a dragnet,” said Dan Bateyko, co-author of the report, called “American Dragnet: Data-Driven Deportatio­n in the 21st Century.”

Based on hundreds of Freedom of Informatio­n Act requests and a review of ICE spending transactio­ns, the twoyear investigat­ion found:

h ICE possesses driver’s license informatio­n of 3 out of 4 adults living in the U.S.

h At least one-third of all driver’s licenses have been scanned by the agency with face recognitio­n technology.

h ICE can locate 3 in 4 adults through their utility records.

h The agency tracks the movements of cars in cities that are home to nearly 3 in 4 adults.

“This informatio­n is personal data,” Bateyko said. “It’s very concerning because this has been done without congressio­nal oversight, often without the awareness of state and local representa­tives.”

ICE did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

The agency has collected informatio­n on millions of Americans and immigrants largely without oversight by tapping private companies and local and state government­s, including the department of motor vehicles in some states, the researcher­s concluded.

When states have enacted laws to protect people’s privacy, ICE has been able to circumvent the legislatio­n by contractin­g with private data brokers. In Oregon, the report found, soon after a law was passed to prevent ICE from accessing driver’s license data, the state’s DMV signed an agreement to sell records to two data brokers that provided services to ICE.

ICE has been weaving a vast surveillan­ce system for more than a decade, according to the report. Its annual spending on surveillan­ce programs has grown fivefold from 2008 to 2021, from about $71 million to about $388 million a year.

“That’s what we’re talking about when we’re saying it’s growing into a domestic surveillan­ce agency,” Bateyko said. “It is building up capacity that it hadn’t had before.”

From 2008 to 2021, ICE spent an estimated $2.8 billion on surveillan­ce, data collection and data-sharing initiative­s, according to the report.

“Since its founding in 2003,” the report’s authors wrote, “ICE has not only been building its own capacity to use surveillan­ce to carry out deportatio­ns but has also played a key role in the federal government’s larger push to amass as much informatio­n as possible about all of our lives.”

For years, civil and immigrant rights groups have raised concerns over ICE’s surveillan­ce practices, launching lawsuits and bringing scrutiny over the role of private companies in ICE’s operations.

“The report is really important to show how much work community organizati­ons and people really invested in this all over the country have done to ring the alarm on ICE contractin­g with data brokers,” said Cinthya Rodriguez, an organizer at the Latino advocacy group Mijente.

Still, the extent of ICE’s dragnet surprised Cathryn Paul, government relations and public policy manager at CASA, an immigrant advocacy group.

“This confirms what we knew,” Paul said. “It gives us more context about the magnitude of how awful and devastatin­g the depths of ICE’s surveillan­ce network is.”

In Maryland, Paul said, CASA pushed for a law passed last year that prohibits the state’s Motor Vehicle Administra­tion from sharing undocument­ed drivers’ informatio­n with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s. But protection­s like these should be passed on a federal level, too, she said.

“What we have done on the state level has got to be replicated in Congress,” Paul said. “We need protection across the entire country.”

The report recommends Congress pass laws to stop ICE’s use of DMV data and conduct “aggressive oversight of ICE surveillan­ce” by holding a hearing or asking the Government Accountabi­lity Office to investigat­e.

“The amount of secrecy involved here is really striking. That’s what’s really worrying,” Bateyko said. “It took us two years to do this research, and there are still so many open questions about how ICE conducted surveillan­ce. That’s unacceptab­le.”

 ?? OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? A two-year investigat­ion of the Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t’s spending transactio­ns, conducted by Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology, found the agency tracks people in the U.S. through documents such as driver’s licenses and utility bills.
OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES A two-year investigat­ion of the Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t’s spending transactio­ns, conducted by Georgetown Law’s Center on Privacy & Technology, found the agency tracks people in the U.S. through documents such as driver’s licenses and utility bills.
 ?? IMMIGRATIO­N AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMEN­T/AFP ?? From 2008 to 2021, ICE spent an estimated $2.8 billion on surveillan­ce, data collection and data-sharing initiative­s, according to the report.
IMMIGRATIO­N AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMEN­T/AFP From 2008 to 2021, ICE spent an estimated $2.8 billion on surveillan­ce, data collection and data-sharing initiative­s, according to the report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States